Inserting dummy date of 1970-1-1 is a bad idea. Can we rather allow
timestamp to be missing instead of throwing error?
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 8:33 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> ls / for a FAT partition leads to
>
>error: invalid modification timestamp for /.
>
> Not all entries of the di
The UEFI specification defines that the EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.Exit(() service
may return EFI_SUCCESS or EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER. So it cannot be
__attribute__((noreturn)).
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
include/grub/efi/api.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/
On 1/22/22 10:07, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Inserting dummy date of 1970-1-1 is a bad idea. Can we rather allow
timestamp to be missing instead of throwing error?
This function seems only to be used for validation of the timestamp.
I never have seen the ls command in GRUB actually di