[PATCH] module-verifier: make it possible to run checkers on grub-module-verifierxx.c

This makes it so you can treat grub-module-verifierxx.c as a file you can build directly, so syntax checkers like vim's "syntastic" plugin, which uses "gcc -x c -fsyntax-only" to build it, will work. One still has to do whatever setup is required to make it pick the right include dirs, which -W op

[PATCH] grub-module-verifier: report the filename or modname in errors.

Make it so that when grub-module-verifier complains of an issue, it tells you which module the issue was with. Signed-off-by: Peter Jones --- util/grub-module-verifier.c| 6 ++-- util/grub-module-verifierXX.c | 58 ++ include/grub/module_verifier.h | 4 +--

[PATCH] Fix an 8 year old typo.

Signed-off-by: Peter Jones --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 5f47a9265f3..9ab683fefac 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ fi AC_SUBST(bootdirname) AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(GRUB_BOOT_DIR

Any plans for GRUB 2.03 release?

Dear GRUB developers, A lot of changes have been made since the GRUB 2.02 release, and distribution start to cherry-pick them. In my opinion, it’d be helpful if a new release was made. Do you have already plans? Kind regards, Paul signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messag

Re: Any plans for GRUB 2.03 release?

On 08/01/2018 11:23 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > A lot of changes have been made since the GRUB 2.02 release, and > distribution start to cherry-pick them. In my opinion, it’d be helpful > if a new release was made. Daniel and Vladimir actually talked about those plans at FOSDEM [1]. Adrian > [1] ht