On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 03:23:56PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:42:30PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:03:21PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:07:15PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:37
Thanks for review
New version is attached
From 19e3f13632a20a0b1be12b6d6ff4c52ba4f3b4d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Solovyov
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 13:55:46 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Don't skip /dev/mapper/dm-* devices
This patch ensures that grub-probe will find the root device placed in
/d
Is there a way to specify a FTDI based serial console using
GRUB_TERMINAL, GRUB_SERIAL_COMMAND, or some other variable? If yes,
what is the syntax?
BTW my serial port adapter matches the vendor id and device id given
in grub-core/bus/usb/serial/ftdi.c:
Bus 001 Device 008: ID 0403:6001 Future Tec
Add the raid6 recovery, in order to use a raid6 filesystem even if some
disks (up to two) are missing.
This code use the old md raid6 code already present in grub.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 43 +++
1 file changed, 39 ins
This is a preparatory patch, to help the adding of the raid5/6 recovery code.
In case of availability of all disks, this code is good for all the RAID
profiles. However in case of failure, the error handling is quite different.
Refactoring this code increases the general readability.
Signed-off-by
This is a preparatory patch. The callee knows better if this
error is fatal, or if it exists another available disk.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 61
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
index be195448d..7e287d0ec 100644
--- a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
+++ b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
@@ -119
This helper was used in few places to help the debugging. As conservative
approach, in case of error it is only logged. This because I was unaware
if this could change something the error handling of the previous
code.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 24
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 178 +--
1 file changed, 173 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
index fc4198e39..8d72607d1 100644
--- a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
+++ b/grub-core/f
The original grub code which handles the recovery of a raid6 disks array
assumes that all the read are multiple of 1 << GRUB_DISK_SECTOR_BITS and
it also assumes that all the I/O is done via the struct
grub_diskfilter_segment.
This is not true for the btrfs code. In order to reuse the native
grub_r
Hi All,
the aim of this patches set is to provide support for a BTRFS raid5/6
filesystem in GRUB.
The first patch, implements the basic support for raid5/6. I.e this works when
all the disks are present.
The next 4 patches, are preparatory ones.
The 6th patch implements the raid5 recovery fo
I was wrong this is the V3 patches set ; the subject is wrong. Sorry for the
inconvenient.
On 05/11/2018 09:24 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> the aim of this patches set is to provide support for a BTRFS raid5/6
> filesystem in GRUB.
>
> The first patch, implements the basic suppo
I was wrong this is the V3 patches set ; the subject is wrong. Sorry for the
inconvenient.
On 05/11/2018 09:24 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> the aim of this patches set is to provide support for a BTRFS raid5/6
> filesystem in GRUB.
>
> The first patch, implements the basic suppo
13 matches
Mail list logo
