Re: [PATCH 3/5] i386/relocator: Remove unused avoid_efi_bootservices argument

2015-05-29 Thread Daniel Kiper
Hey, Sorry for late reply but I was busy with our internal EFI stuff. We did more tests and some fixes and it seems that everything is going in right direction. Well, I hope... :-))) Right now I am going to continue my work on upstream EFI + GRUB2 + Xen stuff. I think that I will be able to releas

Re: [PATCH 3/5] i386/relocator: Remove unused avoid_efi_bootservices argument

2015-05-29 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 29 May 2015 22:58:43 +0200 Daniel Kiper пишет: > Another questions is why grub_relocator_alloc_chunk_addr() does not consult > EFI > memory map if grub_relocator_alloc_chunk_align() does. Should not we fix it? My best guess is that grub_relocator_alloc_chunk_addr() gets target from elsew

Re: [PATCH 5/5] zfs extensible_dataset and large_blocks feature support

2015-05-29 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 15 May 2015 10:50:59 +0300 Toomas Soome пишет: > > hi! > so what is the status of this last feature pair? its the final bundle to get > full support of modern openzfs to grub and since zfs on all major players > (illumos/zol/freebsd) support this feature, its only question of time wh

Re: [PATCH] arm64/setjmp: Add missing license macro

2015-05-29 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
Leif, any comments? You are the author of it, was GRUB_MOD_LICENSE omission intentional or by accident? В Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:48 -0600 dann frazier пишет: > Including the setjmp module in an arm64-efi image will cause it to > immediately exit with an "incompatible license" error. > > The sou

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: V5 filesystem format support

2015-05-29 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Wed, 13 May 2015 09:32:48 +0200 Jan Kara пишет: > > struct grub_xfs_sblock > { > @@ -54,12 +68,19 @@ struct grub_xfs_sblock >grub_uint8_t log2_agblk; >grub_uint8_t unused6[67]; >grub_uint8_t log2_dirblk; > + grub_uint8_t unused7[7]; > + grub_uint32_t features2; > + grub_uint8