On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Beeblebrox wrote:
> OK, I'll try it. But I need clarification:
>
> * Should I copy the repo and do a git rollback on the copy?
Just setup separate tree to perform build. The actual state does not
really matter; you can use current master, ignore doc build error f
Since I got grub's pxe set to go, I have started to try the ideas & solutions.
* Answer to my first question from previous post (I don't see a way
where tftp-server would be able to serve-up the grub menu if it were
in say /data/tftp path?): This seems not possible. TFTPD cannot chroot
(-s) unless
On 26.11.2013 11:01, Beeblebrox wrote:
> Since I got grub's pxe set to go, I have started to try the ideas & solutions.
> * Answer to my first question from previous post (I don't see a way
> where tftp-server would be able to serve-up the grub menu if it were
> in say /data/tftp path?): This seems
>> This doesn't seem to be a GRUB problem at all. I use tftpd which serves
from /var/tftpd
You are right, it is not a GRUB problem; it's a folder structure error
in the way I approached the problem.
>> boot/grub ($prefix) is where grub.cfg goes. Judging from your first
>> question, is it possible
On 26.11.2013 12:26, Beeblebrox wrote:
>>> This doesn't seem to be a GRUB problem at all. I use tftpd which serves
> from /var/tftpd
> You are right, it is not a GRUB problem; it's a folder structure error
> in the way I approached the problem.
>
>>> boot/grub ($prefix) is where grub.cfg goes. Jud
On 26.11.2013 16:48, Jonathan McCune wrote:
> > This redundancy may be cumbersome if attempting
> > +to cryptographically validate the contents of the bootloader
> embedding
> > +area, or in more modern systems with GPT-style partition tables
> > +(@pxref{BIOS installation}) w
I started to clean --pubkey in docs, hit grub-mkimage reference, hit
"grub-install is just a shell script" ... it really needs cleanup. Is
grub-install terse description intentional? If not, I'm going to
actually document all utilities and all options not defined as hidden.
We probably need to ment
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I started to clean --pubkey in docs, hit grub-mkimage reference, hit
"grub-install is just a shell script" ... it really needs cleanup. Is
grub-install terse description intentional? If not, I'm going to
actually document all utilities and all options not defined as hidden
В Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:02:09 -0800
Jonathan McCune пишет:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > I started to clean --pubkey in docs, hit grub-mkimage reference, hit
> > "grub-install is just a shell script" ... it really needs cleanup.
>
>
> I think the grub-mkimage r
Il 25/11/2013 20:35, M A Young ha scritto:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I did a test following informations on one of post before:
git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/grub.git # commit
61e1b9a49d48035bde52784abb54c3212b647fc8
./autogen.sh
./configure --target=x86_64 --with-platform=x
В Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:58:47 +0100
Fabio Fantoni пишет:
>
> I have also another question:
> Is possible specify multiple path where search the grub.cfg for support
> all mainly distributions and add a custom cfg path support taking it
> from arguments?
>
You can do something like
if search -
В Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:58:09 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> Hello, all. It's time to start gearing towards 2.02 release
> - 2.01 number will be skipped in order to follow odd/even convention for
> release/git.
> On 17th December will be the feature freeze, after it only bugfi
On 26.11.2013 19:49, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:58:09 +0100
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>
>> Hello, all. It's time to start gearing towards 2.02 release
>> - 2.01 number will be skipped in order to follow odd/even convention for
>> release/git.
>> On 17th D
On 26/11/13 18:12, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:58:47 +0100
> Fabio Fantoni пишет:
>
>> I have also another question:
>> Is possible specify multiple path where search the grub.cfg for support
>> all mainly distributions and add a custom cfg path support taking it
>> from argu
---
gentpl.py | 37 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gentpl.py b/gentpl.py
index f0f4493..5bee43a 100644
--- a/gentpl.py
+++ b/gentpl.py
@@ -119,14 +119,15 @@ class AutogenState:
need_idx, need_rbracket, indx_name, have_val
I already mentioned this on IRC, but I thought it'd be helpful to send
it here as well.
This patch series (also in the cjwatson/new-autogen git branch)
eliminates the use of Autogen and instead generates Automake input
directly from gentpl.py.
Autogen's definitions files were useful, and I've mai
---
.gitignore |1 -
ChangeLog|6 +
INSTALL |1 -
autogen.sh | 11 +-
conf/Makefile.common | 15 +-
conf/Makefile.extra-dist |1 -
gentpl.py| 1007 +++---
7
---
gentpl.py | 46 ++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gentpl.py b/gentpl.py
index 5bee43a..0c5eabb 100644
--- a/gentpl.py
+++ b/gentpl.py
@@ -106,9 +106,11 @@ for platform in GRUB_PLATFORMS:
#
# We support a subset of
18 matches
Mail list logo
