>> 915resolution and ntldr-img (which is grub4dos functionality - right?)
>>are under GPL3 (COPYING files in the respective repos).
> Is mostly an unclean hack adapted from a standalone program by someone else
> than the original author.
That would be me (http://nathancoulson.com/proj_grub2_915.s
2010/12/15 yannubu...@gmail.com
> Dear all,
>
> I did the following test :
> - install Ubuntu 10.04 on my dev/sda3 , it is correctly recognized by
> os-prober
> - move all its files into a folder (to simulate its deletion while being
> able to easily restore it) :
> sudo mount /dev/sda3 /mnt ; su
2010/12/15 Nathan Coulson :
> That would be me (http://nathancoulson.com/proj_grub2_915.shtml).
> Made a few years back, based upon the original 915resolution
> (According to LICENSE.txt from 915resolution, 915resolution is in the
> public domain). Since KMS was added to the linux kernel, though,
not really.
ive seen some things when i made my last grub disk there was sth like
stage1.eltorito ..
please help ..
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:01:05 -0500
> Von: Chris Jones
> An: grub-devel@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: grub-cd
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 05:18:
just because the mainboard doesn't support booting from usb.
it's not that modern .. :)=
what's this stage1.eltorito stuff about ..
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:28:52 +0300
> Von: Dmitry Ilyin
> An: The development of GNU GRUB
> Betreff: Re: grub-cd
> 10.1
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:53:47AM EST, thanos migosch wrote:
> not really.
> ive seen some things when i made my last grub disk there was sth like
> stage1.eltorito ..
> please help ..
Sorry, was way behind with my mail and thought I was on a debian mailing
list when I wrote that for some reaso
Dear all,
For the "Linux uninstaller" project [1], I need your help :
- Is there a reliable way to check (in bash) if a functional (not altered,
e.g. by another bootloader) stage1 is in a MBR ?
- Or/and the contrary (stage1 is altered or not present) ?
I observed that we can read (in hex) the wor
