On 05/31/2010 11:16 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Looks like we have to have different behaviour for different BSDs.
Since it looks like generic code would fail for ThisBSD or ThatBSD,
I propose to go by as-needed basis. So I think we should: -restrict
bsdlabel to being embed
On 06/01/2010 12:34 PM, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>
> if disk->partition is not NULL/* embedded partition */
> and
> disk->partition's partmap is msdos
> and
> disk->partition's msdos partition type is NetBSD or OpenBSD
> then
> interpret BSD label offsets as
Hi Vladimir,
even I am too busy to do any development or "research", I tried at least
to shortly test the usb branch code, as you wrote here:
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I've merged your latest patch into usb branch too, fixing some
> problems
> it would have on yeeloong. Compi
On 06/01/2010 11:14 PM, Aleš Nesrsta wrote:
> On both HCs was not working device which has max. packet length for
> control endpoint lower than 64. As I remember that this patch was
> relative simple, I shortly looked into usb.c and usbtrans.c and there is
> mistake:
>
> --- usbtrans.c
> +++ usbtra
On 06/02/2010 02:27 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> very slow on this controller. Unfortunately I currently have no time to
>> discover why - I am expecting some mistake probably in "toggling" and
>> related code in ohci.c.
>>
>>
> >There is probably some new problem in
