Re: [PATCH] Refuse to install on XFS destroying its superblock

2009-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > > wrote: > > > The danger is that fs_probe may reject filesystem as valid just because > it's newer than

Re: [GITGRUB] Support PXE option and new command pxecfg

2009-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:02:13PM +0800, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > Update: > > Now pxe fs exports PXE_MAC and PXE_IP on startup. Hi Bean, Are you going to provide a patch? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your da

Re: [PATCH] Refuse to install on XFS destroying its superblock

2009-10-20 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> Robert Millan wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> The danger is that fs_probe may reject filesyst

Re: [GITGRUB] Support PXE option and new command pxecfg

2009-10-20 Thread Bean
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:02:13PM +0800, Bean wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Update: >> >> Now pxe fs exports PXE_MAC and PXE_IP on startup. > > Hi Bean, > > Are you going to provide a patch? Hi, Here is it, the command pxecfg is skipped as it depend

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Bean
Hi, Update: Add dialog support, it allows you to write a template and call it with different parameters, for example: dialog_edit { panel { parameters = "text=edit.text" class = frame width = 80% attach_hcenter = 0 attach_vcenter = 0 edit { lines = 10 } } }

Re: powerpc/sparc problems

2009-10-20 Thread rubisher
Felix Zielcke wrote: Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 10:55 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: And also anyone who has access to a powerpc machine (and experience)? Oh and I forgot to mention, that the powerpc version doestn't even build now with 1.97~beta4: _restgpr_31_x in boot is not defined Full bu

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello 2009/10/17 Bean : > Hi, > > Update: > > Add sub menu support, generate widgets dynamically using menu entries. The example is very complex and I don't quite understand what is the advantage of this baroque scheme over generating the menus in grub.d in files like 00_header or 10_linux. For

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/10/18 Bean : > Hi, > > Update: > > Add mapkey section. For example: > > mapkey { >  f5 = ctrl-x > } Does this also generate a mapkey text which you can dump into a text box so that people know what is mapped to what (and the same for the default bindings and grub version/last git commit)? Wo

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/10/20 Bean : > Hi, > > Update: > > Add dialog support, it allows you to write a template and call it with > different parameters, for example: > > dialog_edit { >  panel { >    parameters = "text=edit.text" >    class = frame >    width = 80% >    attach_hcenter = 0 >    attach_vcenter = 0 > >

Re: powerpc/sparc problems

2009-10-20 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
rubisher wrote: > Felix Zielcke wrote: >> Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 10:55 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: >> >>> And also anyone who has access to a powerpc machine (and experience)? >> >> Oh and I forgot to mention, that the powerpc version doestn't even build >> now with 1.97~beta4: >> >> _restgpr_

[PATCH] auto-generate libgcc.h

2009-10-20 Thread Robert Millan
This should be a much cleaner option than maintaining libgcc.h by hand. Only tested on sparc, but it should also cast out the build problems on powerpc. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's t

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Cros
I find that the 2 terminal configuration with hotkey switch can be very useful alternative in some situations (debugging ...) , particularly on 1920x1200 screen. Single screen popup can be default for normal use. On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2009/10/20 Bean : > > > m

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Bean
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Hello > > 2009/10/17 Bean : >> Hi, >> >> Update: >> >> Add sub menu support, generate widgets dynamically using menu entries. > > The example is very complex and I don't quite understand what is the > advantage of this baroque scheme over g

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Bean
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2009/10/18 Bean : >> Hi, >> >> Update: >> >> Add mapkey section. For example: >> >> mapkey { >>  f5 = ctrl-x >> } > > Does this also generate a mapkey text which you can dump into a text > box so that people know what is mapped to what (and

Re: [GITGRUB] New menu interface (implementation)

2009-10-20 Thread Bean
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2009/10/20 Bean : >> Hi, >> >> Update: >> >> Add dialog support, it allows you to write a template and call it with >> different parameters, for example: >> >> dialog_edit { >>  panel { >>    parameters = "text=edit.text" >>    class = fram

Re: [PATCH] auto-generate libgcc.h

2009-10-20 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Robert Millan wrote: > This should be a much cleaner option than maintaining libgcc.h by hand. Only > tested on sparc, but it should also cast out the build problems on powerpc. > > 1) Doesn't work in cross-compiler environment. You confused CC and TARGET_CC 2) Symbols don't get included into s