Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 20:21 -0500 schrieb richardvo...@gmail.com:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >>> Currently grub-mkconfig
os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
filesystem modules, etc.
Today's crazy idea was to implement a FUSE wrapper for grub-fs
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
> filesystem modules, etc.
>
>
Hi,
After considering the discussion of first post, I come up with the
second draft for new menu interface implementation.
First, the basic drawing unit is now region, there are four types:
text
Single line of text, have alignment attribute.
image
An image, have scaling and alignment attribute.
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
I'm actively uninterested in write support; in this case it would do
much more harm than good.
> Of course,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
>> interface so that it can have read/write support in grub2 !
>
> I'm actively uninterested in write support; in thi
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
> >> interface so that it can have read/write support in
2009/9/7 Colin Watson :
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > The level of functionality provided by the existing filesystem modules
>> > would be quite sufficient.
>>
>> Oh I see, you mean the other way around, using th
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:39:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> >> Actually I've considered this before. My goal is to add a mini FUSE fs
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to load huge piles of
> filesystem modules, etc.
>
2009/9/7 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko :
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
>> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replaying
>> journals (we don't yet, but we should), we have to lo
Ladies and gentlemen,
It would appear that the ext2-fs driver is not reliably able to read
directories on my ~3TB / filesystem:
/dev/root 3.4T 1.7T 1.6T 52% /
/dev/root on / type ext4 (rw,noatime,barrier=1,data=ordered)
Whilst doing some troubleshooting over IRC, I was given a debu
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/9/7 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko :
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
>>> os-prober mounts filesystems using Linux's filesystem drivers. This of
>>> course means that we have to go to special lengths to avoid replay
13 matches
Mail list logo
