Re: [PATCH] support of hfsx ( case comparaison )

Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 12:11 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko a écrit : > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > Le 7 févr. 09 à 22:02, Robert Millan a écrit : > > > >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:52:48PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Here is

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller: >> From: Marco Gerards >> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200 >> >> > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He >> > actually wrote all the intial co

Re: [PATCH] support of hfsx ( case comparaison )

> Well, thanks for taking time to review :) You're welcome > > Just for my own curiosity, isn't the inlining of function automatic with > gcc and recent compiler ? It is. However if you want to be sure better to say it explicitely > >> @@ -218,6 +228,7 @@ struct grub_hfsplus_data >>/* This is t

Re: porting Grub to Xen

> > Neither have I, but xen-devel says MiniOS is BSD, and should be > acceptable for Grub. If it's under MIT or new BSD license it is. However no code with unclear licensing can be used in grub2 > >> Also it's much better in licensing and technical point of view to do >> it from scratch: it usually

grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

I wonder why nobody on this list noticed this yet. Jordi reported this already on Debian a while ago [0] It fails with `No suitable backend could be found for gfxterm.' The problem is that gfxterm is used when nothing is explicitly specified and the fonts were compiled, but the fails because vbe.m

Re: [PATCH] support of hfsx ( case comparaison )

Le mercredi 03 juin 2009 à 11:26 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko a écrit : > I see a two last problems with your patch: > + grub_uint32_t clump_size; // ignored > We use /* Ignored. */ style of comments > @@ -3106,7 +3112,6 @@ > (freetype_libs): Likewise. > > * util/grub-mk

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Savannah has recovered now: > https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828 > > I checked out both their SVN backups with rsync. > The April one seems to be really working but the incomplete May not: > $ svnadmin verify gru

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0] > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html > I checked it out with rsync and verified it with `svnadmin verify' > It's up to rev 2238 so we on

Re: [PATCH] add true and false commands

Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko: > However convention for > creating false is: > return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_TEST_FAILURE, "false"); > and not > return 1; Ok changed it. If everyone is fine with placing this in normal/main.c, I commit it. -- Felix

Re: Copyright lines not being updated!

Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 22:31 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:44:27AM +0800, Bean wrote: > > Hi, > > > > git users can add this at the beginning of .git/hooks/pre-commit to > > run the copyright update test before committing: > > > > L1=`git diff --cached --stat 2>/de

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:51 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > > > Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0] > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html > > I checked it out with rsync a

multiboot take partial mmap

Try create gub2 multiboot cd. My kernel worked fine with grub-legacy. But encounter problem. kernel receive mmap up to 1meg... lsmmap command show full mmap. multiboot fill mmap over grub_mmap_iterate, lsmmap get mmap over grub_machine_mmap_iterate. May be machine_mmap is better? Sometime, ke

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:43 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > I wonder why nobody on this list noticed this yet. > Jordi reported this already on Debian a while ago [0] > > It fails with `No suitable backend could be found for gfxterm.' > The problem is that gfxterm is used when nothing is explicitly

Re: [PATCH] support of hfsx ( case comparaison )

Hello! I think the ChangeLog needs to be improved. It's immodest to claim "complete" support for something. It's a very strong statement. It's better to say "improve". Or better yet, let's be specific. Also please spell check the entry. "insensitive" and "insentive" is not the same. You want

EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit

Hello, just talked with a guy from the debian-boot people about using grub-efi for the Intel Mac Users. Is there any way avaible in Linux to detect somehow if the EFI is 64bit or 32bit? Maybe some list of CPUs which could be grep'ed from /proc/cpuinfo or so? I read on refit page that Apple introdu

Homepage outdated

(CCing Okuji so he hopefully reads this) The homepage still says grub2 is under development and the FAQ says: It is usable, but we are still making incompatible changes from time to time. Stabilizing the features is planned in November, 2008 November 2008 has already been past. So what are the pl

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 16:55 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:43 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > I wonder why nobody on this list noticed this yet. > > Jordi reported this already on Debian a while ago [0] > > > > It fails with `No suitable backend could be found for gf

Re: Homepage outdated

Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 23:53 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > (CCing Okuji so he hopefully reads this) Args actually forgot to CC him. > The homepage still says grub2 is under development and the FAQ says: > It is usable, but we are still making incompatible changes from time to > time. Stabi

Re: multiboot take partial mmap

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Andrey Valyaev wrote: > Try create gub2 multiboot cd. > My kernel worked fine with grub-legacy. > > But encounter problem. > kernel receive mmap up to 1meg... > lsmmap command show full mmap. > > multiboot fill mmap over grub_mmap_iterate, > lsmmap get mmap over gru

Re: EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Hello, > > just talked with a guy from the debian-boot people about using grub-efi > for the Intel Mac Users. > Is there any way avaible in Linux to detect somehow if the EFI is 64bit > or 32bit? If you EFI-boot linux then its architecture is

Re: Homepage outdated

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > (CCing Okuji so he hopefully reads this) > > The homepage still says grub2 is under development and the FAQ says: > It is usable, but we are still making incompatible changes from time to > time. Stabilizing the features is planned in Novembe