G5 powerpc64 undefined reference to `grub_machine_mmap_iterate'

After Revision 1924 Harmonize ieee1275's grub_available_iterate() with the generic grub_machine_mmap_iterate() Attempting to make Rev 1928, configuration ieee1275 on G5 powerpc64 I am stuck with this error: kernel_elf-kern_ieee1275_init.o: In function `grub_claim_heap': /home/pxw/

Re: [PATCH] Compilation PowerPC64

My patch only corrects the compilation error introduced by revision 1924. I have tested it in both P5 and P6 machines and all worked right. On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 16:30 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:58 -0200, Manoel wrote: > > This patch corrects compilation in PowerPC64 due

Re: G5 powerpc64 undefined reference to `grub_machine_mmap_iterate'

I have already sent a patch to correct this. look at the email with subject [PATCH] Compilation PowerPC64. It should work for you. On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 00:12 +1100, peter cros wrote: > After Revision 1924 > Harmonize ieee1275's grub_available_iterate() with the generic > grub_machi

ld option --build-id=none

In the file conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk I need in newer ld versions to have: kernel_elf_LDFLAGS = $(COMMON_LDFLAGS) -static-libgcc -lgcc \ -Wl,-N,-S,-Ttext,0x20,-Bstatic,--build-id=none and in older versions: kernel_elf_LDFLAGS = $(COMMON_LDFLAGS) -static-libgcc -lgcc \ -Wl,-N,-S,-Tte

Re: [PATCH] (ata.mod) avoid passing grub_errno to upper layer

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:17:17PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Saturday 22 November 2008 16:35:09 Robert Millan wrote: > > When an error is detected by ata.mod during drive scan, it will pass it to > > the upper layer. This results in GRUB aborting when trying to enter normal > > mode, e

Re: grub.elf? As in "How do I create that?"

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:33:11PM -0500, Gregg Levine wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:05:24PM -0500, Gregg Levine wrote: > >> > >> Hello! > >> You did reply on the coreboot list, however I am still working out how >

Re: [PATCH] Compilation PowerPC64

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:30:45PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:58 -0200, Manoel wrote: > > This patch corrects compilation in PowerPC64 due to some recent changes. > > The compilation problems exist even when compiling for 32-bit PowerPC. > However, I'm getting errors in

Re: [PATCH] Compilation PowerPC64

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 05:58:23PM -0200, Manoel wrote: > This patch corrects compilation in PowerPC64 due to some recent changes. Thanks. Committed with some adjustments. Btw, please include a ChangeLog entry next time! -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We

Re: ld option --build-id=none

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 01:21:43PM -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote: > In the file conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk I need in newer ld versions to > have: > > kernel_elf_LDFLAGS = $(COMMON_LDFLAGS) -static-libgcc -lgcc \ > -Wl,-N,-S,-Ttext,0x20,-Bstatic,--build-id=none > > > and in older

Re: [PATCH] grub-install on coreboot

Committed (after adjusting indentation) On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 04:53:14PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Hi, > > This patch implements grub-install on coreboot. Since there's no pre-defined > boot protocol on this platform, we simply generate a usable Multiboot image > and dump it to /boot.

Re: ld option --build-id=none

But it is only passed in modules compilation. I need it when creating kernel.elf as well. On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 20:59 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 01:21:43PM -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote: > > In the file conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk I need in newer ld versions to > >

Re: [PATCH] Corrections to affs and sfs

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Krzysztof Smiechowicz wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to submit the following patch: > > * fs/affs.c: Return failure when directory iteration failed. > > * fs/sfs.c: Return failure when directory iteration failed. Correct > order in which btree nodes ar

Re: ld option --build-id=none

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:11:12PM -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote: > But it is only passed in modules compilation. I need it when creating > kernel.elf as well. I assume we want this for every *_elf target? Then we shouldn't be restricting it to modules (perhaps this comes from the assumpti

Re: ld option --build-id=none

Its not necessary when creating the .o object files, only when linking then to create the final kern.elf. That is done changing the variable kernel_elf_LDFLAGS in conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk. but I dont know how to use the grub_cv_prog_ld_build_id_none variable in aclocal.m4 to change kernelelf_LDF

Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split)

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:23:52PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > > > I've been thinking... what if we make this generic? I.e. with an event > > loop, then terminals can register their poll functions to it, and write > > their stuff to a shared resource the rest of GRUB can read from. > > F

Re: ld option --build-id=none

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:30:22PM -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote: > Its not necessary when creating the .o object files, only when linking > then to create the final kern.elf. > That is done changing the variable kernel_elf_LDFLAGS in > conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk. > > but I dont know how to

Re: G5 powerpc64 undefined reference to `grub_machine_mmap_iterate'

Yes, thanks, I already ran the patch and checked the files, but still get the error. I will recheck, I may be doing something wrong here, but no compile problems before 1924 . I dont know if the machine could affect this, it is Apple powermac G5. On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Manoel Rebelo Ab