This patch corrects compilation in PowerPC64 due to some recent changes.
--
Best Regards,
Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil
Index: conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk
===
--- conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk (rev
Hi all,
While I don't think I have the skills to make good documentation but
that's not just the issue of that post. What is also felt is the
necessity of making a good GUI-based tool (say for changing timeouts
or for changing the wallpaper and stuff like that). There may be a
case for having a to
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 02:22 +0530, shirish wrote:
> My whole idea of making the blog post was simply this :-
OK, maybe I was unclear, but my point was that advertizing your blogs in
this list is not a good idea. I'm not an administrator or moderator,
it's just my opinion based on common sense.
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:58 -0200, Manoel wrote:
> This patch corrects compilation in PowerPC64 due to some recent changes.
The compilation problems exist even when compiling for 32-bit PowerPC.
However, I'm getting errors in qemu with your patch:
stack: 5bfff80 malloc_base: 0 0x0580 0x06000
Hello!
I have some troubles setting up grub2 on my configuration. After I
bought a new computer I decided to "go wild" and setup everything on top
of LVM, with LVM itself on RAID array. I expected there will be some
problems and here I am :)
Few words about configuration - I have 2x WD 640GB
Also here on powerpc64 G5, after the recent change from
grub_available_iterate() to grub_machine_mmap_iterate().
...
kernel_elf-kern_ieee1275_init.o: In function `grub_claim_heap':
/home/pxw/src/grub2/build/../kern/ieee1275/init.c:182: undefined
reference to `grub_machine_mmap_iterate'
kernel_elf-
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Wojciech Pyczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have some troubles setting up grub2 on my configuration. After I bought a
> new computer I decided to "go wild" and setup everything on top of LVM, with
> LVM itself on RAID array. I expected there will be so
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 02:49, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 02:22 +0530, shirish wrote:
>
>> My whole idea of making the blog post was simply this :-
>
> OK, maybe I was unclear, but my point was that advertizing your blogs in
> this list is not a good idea. I'm
