Re: [PATCH] iso9660 UUID support by using the creation date/time

2008-09-06 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:02:57PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 31.08.2008, 20:55 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > > Args, I'm blind :( > > I copied the function from fs/ntfs.c and there it says `grub_malloc 16 + > > sizeof (\0)' > > With "" it's useless so .5 attached so it does

Re: [PATCH] iso9660 UUID support by using the creation date/time

2008-09-06 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Samstag, den 06.09.2008, 13:11 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:02:57PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Bean did only the joliet support and he already said it looks okay. > > But Marco I'd like to have your comment because you initially coded the > > iso9660 support :)

Re: [RFC] general-usage real-mode loader

2008-09-06 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:27:51PM +0200, phcoder wrote: > Hello. A long time ago I written a C+asm code which loads any given code > at any real-mode location, then puts machine in correct state and then > launches the kernel. I can modify this code to suit GRUB2. Then loading > realmode kernel wo

Re: floating point exception in disk/raid.c:206

2008-09-06 Thread Felix Zielcke
Commited. Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 11:29 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > > The easiest fix would be probable to just set chunk_size to for example > > 64. > > Attached patch does it, but maybe you have a better/other idea?

Re: Idea: Move kernel to upper memory

2008-09-06 Thread BVK
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 04:15:33PM +0530, BVK Chaitanya wrote: >> >> Since payload(s) needs to be present at their precise positions only >> after the boot command, we can always deterministically /schedule/ >> memmove oper

Re: [RFC]swapfso and "ioctl" function for filesystems

2008-09-06 Thread phcoder
Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:27:20PM +0200, phcoder wrote: >>> Could this be made more transparent? For example, with a variable. >>> >> Here perhaps it could be. But in other usage cases like putting the dos >> boot files into the right place or doing swapfso it couldn't. >

Re: [RFC] general-usage real-mode loader

2008-09-06 Thread phcoder
I checked the archive found the thread "Idea: Move kernel to upper memory". But what is discussed there is much more general about general memory layout. Here I wanted to speak about just one function. Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:27:51PM +0200, ph