Re: [PATCH] biosdisk, getroot for Cygwin

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:42:23PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > + > + /* Check signature. */ > + if (!(buf[0x1fe] == 0x55 && buf[0x1ff] == 0xaa)) > +return ~0; > + > + /* Serial number offset depends on boot sector type. */ > + if (mbr) > +n = 0x1b8; > + else if (memcmp (buf + 0x

Re: retiring device.map

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 01:39:47AM +0800, Bean wrote: > > Yes, UUID can be useful, it's better to add it to grub2. > > UUID itself is quite easy to get, but the question is how to integrate > it with the existing disk layer. I'm thinking of the following three > implementation: > > 1, Add a func

Re: Please support installation on Xen virtual block devices

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:07:41PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > It doesn't seem to be needed for my simplistic test of installing the > grub-pc .deb and running "install-grub /dev/xvda": > # dpkg -l grub-pc > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | > Status=Not/Inst/C

Re: grub2 and efi-1.x

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:35:35AM +0800, Bean wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Peter Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > refit is just an interface and not an "bootloader", it need always > > grub/lilo (legcay-bios) or elilo (efi) as far as i know > > I mean you should use refit + grub/

Re: grub-probe gets a segfault

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 06:15:27PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 11:53 -0430, Isaac M. Marcos wrote: > > > Does: > > # grub-probe -t device / > > involve anything Debian specific > > It was a generic recommendation. But if grub-probe was compiled by > Debian, it's

Re: grub2 and efi-1.x

2008-05-09 Thread Bean
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:35:35AM +0800, Bean wrote: >> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Peter Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > refit is just an interface and not an "bootloader", it need always >> > grub/lilo (legcay-

Re: grub-probe gets a segfault

2008-05-09 Thread Isaac M. Marcos
El Friday 09 May 2008 08:32:01 Robert Millan escribió: > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 06:15:27PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 11:53 -0430, Isaac M. Marcos wrote: > > > Does: > > > # grub-probe -t device / > > > involve anything Debian specific > > > > It was a generic re

Re: [PATCH] biosdisk, getroot for Cygwin

2008-05-09 Thread Christian Franke
Robert Millan wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:42:23PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: + + /* Check signature. */ + if (!(buf[0x1fe] == 0x55 && buf[0x1ff] == 0xaa)) +return ~0; + + /* Serial number offset depends on boot sector type. */ + if (mbr) +n = 0x1b8; + else if (memcmp

Re: grub-probe gets a segfault

2008-05-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:13 -0430, Isaac M. Marcos wrote: > > Neither could I :-( > > It does not happen in other two AMD64 machines here!! > Only on this one. That confirms my suspicion that the problem is not related to any x86_64 issues. I checked the bug history more carefully, and I think