Hello,
Im trying to use a TPM chip on a motherboard. Ive seen trusted-grub
project but the problem is that it cant work because my motherboard
supports only SATA drive.
=== 2.6 Known Bugs ===
* SATA and Floppy support is currently not included due to the limitation of
stage1.
Now, Ive ju
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:06:19AM +0200, Laurent Dufréchou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Im trying to use a TPM chip on a motherboard. Ive seen trusted-grub
> project but the problem is that it cant work because my motherboard
> supports only SATA drive.
>
> === 2.6 Known Bugs ===
>
> * SATA and Flopp
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:06:19AM +0200, Laurent Dufréchou wrote:
>
> Now, Ive just discovered Grub2.
>
> Im wondering if there is some patch to add support for TPM chip and
> measurement of files on system, thus on sata drive.
Just in case my last message was a bit too confusing, measurement
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Now that I think of it, is there any reason for doing all the cmain()
> >cruft before grub_main() ? Getting to grub_main() only requires a working
> >stack, which we have, and grub_main
Yeah I see what you mean., and I agree a lot. I got a TPM chip in my
computer that I could use to encrypt my hard dsk but I will never use it as
I don't have access to all the thing.
In fact what i'm askig is for a special use case.
My use case is that I provide an embedded computer running linux o
2008/4/18, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:06:19AM +0200, Laurent Dufréchou wrote:
> >
>
> > Now, I've just discovered Grub2.
> >
> > I'm wondering if there is some patch to add support for TPM chip and
> > measurement of files on system, thus on sata drive.
>
>
>
Hope the mail will reach you this time...
Yeah I see what you mean., and I agree a lot. I got a TPM chip in my
computer that I could use to encrypt my hard dsk but I will never use it as
I don't have access to all the thing.
In fact what i'm askig is for a special use case.
My use case is that I p
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
Or maybe that should be a "call" instead..
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Laurent Dufréchou wrote:
> Yeah I see what you mean., and I agree a lot. I got a TPM chip in my
> computer that I could use to encrypt my hard dsk but I will never use it as
> I don't have access to all the thing.
> In fact what i'm askig is for a special u
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:08:59PM +0200, Laurent Dufrechou wrote:
> I think in this use case it is ehicaly correct as I try to measure and
> ensure my system is not corrupted. (Must be the only case where TPM chip are
> good at :) )
This is true in fact. What happens here is that Treacherous Com
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:32 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >Now that I think of it, is there any reason for doing all the cmain()
> > >cruft before grub_main() ? Getting to grub_ma
Hi,
This is the new patch which takes into account the location change of
files in kern/powerpc/ieee1275. Also, the crc part is removed, it's
better to use a separate patch.
--
Bean
diff --git a/disk/ieee1275/nand.c b/disk/ieee1275/nand.c
new file mode 100755
index 000..ba79faa
--- /dev/null
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the new patch which takes into account the location change of
> files in kern/powerpc/ieee1275. Also, the crc part is removed, it's
> better to use a separate patch.
>
> --
> Bean
>
Oh, I forget to add some fi
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:13 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> > + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
>
> Or maybe that should be a "call" instead..
Only if there is any chance of return, and we can handle it.
"exit" in op
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:16:43AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:13 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> > > + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
> >
> > Or maybe that should be a "call" instead..
>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:13 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> > > + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
> >
> > Or maybe that should be a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:38:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > "exit" in open firmware based systems would probably mean returning
> > control to open firmware.
> >
> > By the way, it would be nice to have "exit" in both grub for PC and
> > grub-emu, and not only in the rescue mode. "exit" on P
Bean confirmed it works. Committed without changing jmp to call, since it
wasn't clear whether we want it or not.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
Hi,
diff --git a/term/ieee1275/ofconsole.c b/term/ieee1275/ofconsole.c
index b449507..0d3ba46 100644
--- a/term/ieee1275/ofconsole.c
+++ b/term/ieee1275/ofconsole.c
@@ -84,7 +84,10 @@ grub_ofconsole_putchar (grub_uint32_t c)
{
grub_curr_x++;
if (grub_curr_x > grub_ofconsole_widt
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:22 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> The problem with these TPM chips is that they have the hidden purpose of
> restricting you as user. Despite that you paid for the hardware and are its
> owner, the chip will never give you its master key.
Sorry, but this m
So, will grub2 will one day support TPM ? ;)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part
de Julian Blake Kongslie
Envoyé : vendredi 18 avril 2008 20:21
À : The development of GRUB 2
Objet : Re: TPM support with SATA drives
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:22 +0
21 matches
Mail list logo
