Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:08 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>
>> Previous behavior was working correctly. You have to handle
>> errorcodes
>> at some point and that means when error is handled it is zeroed (or
>> GRUB_ERR_NONE). So code is in callee whe
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:19:55PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>> On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:34, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:08 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> > > Previous behavior was working correctly. You have to han
Vesa Jääskeläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(replying to this mail, I didn't receive the first mail over the list...)
> Robert Millan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:00:57PM +, Oleg Strikov wrote:
>>> Incorrect behavior of grub_file_open () function in e.g. loop context:
>>>
>>> char *
"Oleg Strikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Previous behavior was working correctly. You have to handle
>> >> errorcodes
>> >> at some point and that means when error is handled it is zeroed (or
>> >> GRUB_ERR_NONE). So code is in callee where that loop was.
>>
>> >I suggest that we never set
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:39, Robert Millan wrote:
>> So perhaps it's a good idea to release 1.96 with known regressions after
>> all.
>
> I think that would be a nicer approach at this stage. Anyway, nobody expects
> that GRUB 2 is rock-sol
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:42, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver collection that's
>> even better, of course. This was done for GRUB Legacy, right?
>
> Sure. I had a very short conversation with gp
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 24, 2008 8:14 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It would be nice, not required. I don't expect too much problems
>> here...
>>
>> Perhaps a better approach would be possible to do a check after
>> reading a size:
>>
>> int size = foo();
>>
>
Otavio Salvador schrieb:
os-prober is developed inside Debian Installer team.
I think it's two different but reports and then it would be nice to
report a specific bug (maybe with a proposed patch) for os-prober to
provide what you'd need and then we can push it.
I believe the issue is even ea
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:50:14AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Vesa Jääskeläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (replying to this mail, I didn't receive the first mail over the list...)
>
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:00:57PM +, Oleg Strikov wrote:
> >>> Incorrec
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:22:13PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> So, for the next release, I will make it in next weekend (on the 2nd or the
> 3rd), if nobody objects. Meanwhile, if you know user-visible changes which
> are not written in NEWS yet, please fill them up in that file.
I cam
On Friday 25 January 2008 14:25, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:00:17AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:42, Robert Millan wrote:
> > >> Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver col
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:56, Marco Gerards wrote:
> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:39, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> So perhaps it's a good idea to release 1.96 with known regressions after
> >> all.
> >
> > I think that would be a nicer approach
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:39:14AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Otavio Salvador schrieb:
> >os-prober is developed inside Debian Installer team.
> >
> >I think it's two different but reports and then it would be nice to
> >report a specific bug (maybe with a proposed patch) for os-prober to
> >
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:00:17AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:42, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver collection that's
> >> even better, of course. This was done
14 matches
Mail list logo
