On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 23:26 +0100, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 22:07 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Here's an alternate patch for the issue that appeared on Fedora 8. The
> > linker adds a "build ID" (.not.gnu.build-id) by default.
> Why not? It has been discussed on the list before.
Would you like to point to any information sources where I can read about the
consensus that was achieved on the software design?
Are the applied design issues only visible in the source code so far?
Regards,
Markus
Hello!
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 11:28 +0100, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > I attach the patch I use. The first hunk is basically the same as yours,
> > the second one is self-explanatory.
>
> Actually, the first hunk should better look like this:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2007-11/
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 07:35 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 11:28 +0100, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
>
> > > I attach the patch I use. The first hunk is basically the same as yours,
> > > the second one is self-explanatory.
> >
> > Actually, the first hunk should better
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 13:54 +0100, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 07:35 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > The objcopy test exists to detect certain breakage in objcopy. I'm not
> > sure that testing it in the condition that it only copies .text is
> > sufficient to find the original
Dear list,
I am a fan of Legacy GRUB. But also come to know about GRUB2. What is
the utility of developing GRUB2 ?
is it more fancy than legacy grub ? if yes then I like to know about it.
I have not found any documentation on it.
So needs some guidance from you all. one more point; is grub2 is mor
