On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 12:49 +0100, Tomáš Ebenlendr wrote:
> Dne 15 Březen 2007, 03:55, Hollis Blanchard napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 09:47 -0800, Daniel Weaver wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to propose a definition for "Native Endianess"
> >>
> >>
> >> The data has Native Endianess when a 32-
>> And on true 64 platforms it will be counterintuitive definition.
>>
>
> I don't know what you mean by this. What is a "true 64 platform", and
> what does that have to do with endianness?
As there was no context in the message, the Daniel's definiton gives
no sense for 64bit data as well as 16b
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 01:18 +, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> Log message:
> 2007-03-18 Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * fs/ext2.c (grub_ext2_read_inode): Use the inode size in a
> superblock instead of the structure size to compute an
>
On Sunday 18 March 2007 19:27, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> If the inode size is not 128 bytes, why do we still read `sizeof (struct
> grub_ext2_inode)' bytes from disk?
Because we don't need more than that.
> What is the layout of a non-128-byte
> inode?
There is extra space right after the tradi
That means you will send in patches?
If I had any, surely.
Thanks for your explanation below. Those of you who are volunteers I
salute your efforts.
That is what we have been doing for quite a while. Our main focus was
working towards a release and if you look carefully you will see there
wa
