>> There is plenty of precedent here. So I still see nothing wrong with
>> putting a header file, which describes an interface, under a non-GPL
>> license.
>
> Because GRUB is not a library. The spec is available independently, so
> you can write your own header easily. Nothing prevents you from d
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 11:18 +0100, Tomáš Ebenlendr wrote:
>
> >> There is plenty of precedent here. So I still see nothing wrong
> with
> >> putting a header file, which describes an interface, under a
> non-GPL
> >> license.
> >
> > Because GRUB is not a library. The spec is available independent
At Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:56:50 +0100,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 23:48, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > > An exception is exactly what I am proposing. What is your objection?
> > >
> > > The GNU Project endorses the use of GPL to promote freedom. Don't forget
> > > tha
