On Monday 30 October 2006 21:24, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> The best raison is to have a unified method to identify a module. IMHO the
> argument line is to be interpreted only by the module.
>
> You know all the parameters can be put into the command line...
So you don't want to mix up arguments t
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:43, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 21:15 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 October 2006 20:32, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > Are you saying that given tag->key == foo, tag->length == sizeof(struct
> > > tag_foo)? I think it makes far
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 02:23, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Here is pass #3 of the ELF loader. Changes from #2:
> - the `load' callback no longer modifies the phdr directly
I still don't understand why you want to pass a hook. Why don't you simply
pass a load address?
Okuji
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 21:58 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 November 2006 02:23, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Here is pass #3 of the ELF loader. Changes from #2:
> > - the `load' callback no longer modifies the phdr directly
>
> I still don't understand why you want to pass a hoo
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:54 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> How do I know what the load address should be before I've even looked
> at the program header?
>
> Just because the x86 loader uses fixed values doesn't mean other
> loaders should. In particular, the PowerPC loader is happy to load t
