On Sunday 22 October 2006 16:46, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On request / suggestion / whatever ;-) of Marco I created the following
> patch. Its origin: I was trying to build GRUB2 on a system where no
> (n)curses header files were installed (which configure even detected
> correctly, but didn't com
On Thursday 26 October 2006 21:58, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Module:
> Because of the 'length' field in the tag header, the 'reserved' field
> isn't actually needed. The 'length' field makes every one of these tag
> structures inherently variably sized. Any data added later to this tag
> will be sk
On Friday 27 October 2006 21:19, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Comments please. Also see next mail to see how the PPC Linux loader uses
> it.
So this still loads an image to paddr directly, right?
I think we need these features:
- an ability to pass an address to load an image
- an ability to pass
On Friday 27 October 2006 07:37, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Some platform may need it. On EFI the OS can't get the memmap from EFI
> > because it is too late.
>
> OK. In that case we're still keeping with the philosophy of only passing
> information to the kernel that it can't obtain itself.
Howe
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:47:09PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 22 October 2006 16:46, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > As `grub-emu' is considered to ``only'' be a debugging tool, the
> > patch disables it for a default build (and thusly also avoids the
> > (n)curses dependency f
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 16:11 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 21:58, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Module:
> > Because of the 'length' field in the tag header, the 'reserved' field
> > isn't actually needed. The 'length' field makes every one of these tag
> > structures i
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 16:16 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Friday 27 October 2006 21:19, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Comments please. Also see next mail to see how the PPC Linux loader uses
> > it.
>
> So this still loads an image to paddr directly, right?
>
> I think we need these feature