Ping :)
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:27:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Is it alright for commit now?
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:29:33PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here are some comments about
On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:06, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ping :)
Thank you for prompting me. ;)
Please check it in. I have no objection.
Okuji
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Friday 13 October 2006 23:03, Marco Gerards wrote:
> It's good you mention this, because it's exactly the discussion I want
> to start. The question here is: How do we want to deal with the
> `for'?
>
> In bash it iterates over all arguments. The wildcards are expanded by
> the shell and thus
On Saturday 14 October 2006 00:37, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> This patch adds generic ELF loading infrastructure for both 32-bit and
> 64-bit ELF. It provides an "iterate" function for program headers, and a
> "load" function for convenience.
The idea is very good. But I don't like that loaded area
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 23:03, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> It's good you mention this, because it's exactly the discussion I want
>> to start. The question here is: How do we want to deal with the
>> `for'?
>>
>> In bash it iterates over all argume
So I've merged the result by Jeroen into the main trunk. Please check it out,
if you are interested.
BTW we haven't released a new version for a while. Thus I'd like to make one
tomorrow. Does anybody have an objection? I think LVM and RAID support is
good enough to announce a new version.
Oku
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I've merged the result by Jeroen into the main trunk. Please check it out,
> if you are interested.
Great! Thanks a lot for doing this!
> BTW we haven't released a new version for a while. Thus I'd like to make one
> tomorrow. Does anybod
On Saturday 14 October 2006 17:43, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Ok, that sounds sane. But it does not address my problem. How would
> one iterate over disks and partitions. And perhaps other things like
> loaded modules, etc. Personally I do not care a lot about syntax, but
> I want the language to b
On Saturday 14 October 2006 17:53, Marco Gerards wrote:
> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So I've merged the result by Jeroen into the main trunk. Please check it
> > out, if you are interested.
>
> Great! Thanks a lot for doing this!
You should thank Jeroen instead. ;)
Okuj
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:33:44PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 00:37, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > This patch adds generic ELF loading infrastructure for both 32-bit and
> > 64-bit ELF. It provides an "iterate" function for program headers, and a
> > "load" functio
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:10:49PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:06, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Ping :)
>
> Thank you for prompting me. ;)
>
> Please check it in. I have no objection.
Committed, thanks!
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:36:19PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> So I've merged the result by Jeroen into the main trunk. Please check it out,
> if you are interested.
>
> BTW we haven't released a new version for a while. Thus I'd like to make one
> tomorrow. Does anybody have an objection
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 09:04:32PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Committed, thanks!
Btw, for --target=device and --target=drive, the new grub-probe command should
also be usable on non-i386. I think we just need to disable some code. Any
powerpc user wants to give that a try?
--
Robert Mill
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Friday 22 September 2006 00:08, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Looks like grub-probefs is broken in current CVS:
>
> Thanks. I will take a look tomorrow.
Hi Okuji,
Any news on that? In debian we have to maintain a patch that rev
At Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:36:19 +0200,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> So I've merged the result by Jeroen into the main trunk. Please check it out,
> if you are interested.
>
> BTW we haven't released a new version for a while. Thus I'd like to make one
> tomorrow. Does anybody have an objection? I
At Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:08:05 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:36:19PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > So I've merged the result by Jeroen into the main trunk. Please check it
> > out,
> > if you are interested.
> >
> > BTW we haven't released a new version for a w
On Saturday 14 October 2006 21:18, Robert Millan wrote:
> Any news on that? In debian we have to maintain a patch that reverts this
> commit, but this might have undesired effects. We'd like to stay close to
> upstream if possible.
Done.
Okuji
___
G
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:08:17PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 21:18, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Any news on that? In debian we have to maintain a patch that reverts this
> > commit, but this might have undesired effects. We'd like to stay close to
> > upstream if
18 matches
Mail list logo
