Johan Rydberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> In other projects that I've worked on, we've used a system where the
> core developers can either give a +1 or a -1 on a contributed patch.
> If a patch receives two +1's or more, it is accepted (if there are no
> -1's) and committed by one of the d
At Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:13:55 +0200,
Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> I'm going to work on adding support for LVM to grub-setup now. That's
> the last remaining thing in my SoC project.
This is done now. This means I've finished all the things for my SoC
project. What I've written is a raid module that is a
Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:13:55 +0200,
> Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>> I'm going to work on adding support for LVM to grub-setup now. That's
>> the last remaining thing in my SoC project.
>
> This is done now. This means I've finished all the things for my SoC
On Saturday 12 August 2006 18:09, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't remember precisely, but I think I only added disk devices but not
> > partition devices. On your system, don't disk devices as well as
> > partition devices get enumerated?
>
> I'm
On Saturday 12 August 2006 18:07, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Instead of generating the dependencies separately it can be done the
> first time a file is compiled, with the -MD option to GCC.
That sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Okuji
___
Grub-devel mailing lis
On Sunday 13 August 2006 21:51, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 20:23 +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > At Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:49:06 -0500,
> >
> > Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > What will happen to the google-soc2006 CVS branch when you're done?
> >
> > It should be merged into the m
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 18:07, Johan Rydberg wrote:
>> Instead of generating the dependencies separately it can be done the
>> first time a file is compiled, with the -MD option to GCC.
>
> That sounds good to me.
Committed, with the *.mk file
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 00:37, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> In other projects that I've worked on, we've used a system where the
> core developers can either give a +1 or a -1 on a contributed patch.
> If a patch receives two +1's or more, it is accepted (if there are no
> -1's) and committed by one of
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 13:30, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > I'm going to work on adding support for LVM to grub-setup now. That's
> > the last remaining thing in my SoC project.
>
> This is done now. This means I've finished all the things for my SoC
> project. What I've written is a raid module tha
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Our rules are:
>
> - When you are a committer and a patch is trivial enough, you can
> (and should) check in the patch by yourself.
>
> - If not, you should ask others in grub-devel.
It was for these two scenarios I suggested we could vote on pat
At Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:48:41 +0200,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 15 August 2006 13:30, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > > I'm going to work on adding support for LVM to grub-setup now. That's
> > > the last remaining thing in my SoC project.
> >
> > This is done now. This means I've finished
Hi,
Sorry for late reply because of some other issues, here is my device mapping table,
I describe it in tree format
blk1(floppy)
blkA(BlockDevice cd-rom)
blkB(BlockDevice harddisk)
|- blk2 (primary partition)
|- blk3 (primary
Is grub2 supports "boot from CD" option in menu.lst?
What about its status in to-do list if not already there?
T.KaruppuSwamy
Technical Lead
HCL Technologies Ltd.
Core Technologies Division
J16, Anna Nagar (East)
Chennai
PIN: 600102
Phone: +91-44-26264206 Extn: 301
DISCLAIMER
The contents of thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
