Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree; I think there are far better replacements for CVS. Personally I
>> would highly recommend mercurial, but I suppose everybody has their own
>> preferences. I noticed that Savannah, where the GRUB tree is currently
>> hosted, offers subversion su
Johan Rydberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> I agree; I think there are far better replacements for CVS. Personally I
>>> would highly recommend mercurial, but I suppose everybody has their own
>>> preferences. I noticed that Savannah, where the GRUB
Hi,
In other projects that I've worked on, we've used a system where the
core developers can either give a +1 or a -1 on a contributed patch.
If a patch receives two +1's or more, it is accepted (if there are no
-1's) and committed by one of the developers.
This lowers the pressure on the maint
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 00:37 +0200, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In other projects that I've worked on, we've used a system where the
> core developers can either give a +1 or a -1 on a contributed patch.
> If a patch receives two +1's or more, it is accepted (if there are no
> -1's) and committe
