Hi Jeroen,
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:54, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>if (p)
> -disk->partition = grub_partition_probe (disk, p + 1);
> +{
> + disk->partition = grub_partition_probe (disk, p + 1);
> + if (! disk->partition)
> + {
> + grub_error (GRUB_ERR_UNKNOWN_DEVICE
At Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:07:44 +0200,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:54, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > +
> > + disk->total_sectors = grub_partition_get_len (disk->partition);
> > +}
>
> But I don't agree with this part. The member "total_sectors" must
On Saturday 08 July 2006 22:39, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> But it's a little bit illogical that the size you get from the same
> disk structure isn't the size of the partition, but the size of
> something else.
It is not illogical from my point of view. The disk structure should describe
the informa
At Sat, 8 Jul 2006 23:10:56 +0200,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> On Saturday 08 July 2006 22:39, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > But it's a little bit illogical that the size you get from the same
> > disk structure isn't the size of the partition, but the size of
> > something else.
>
> It is not illo
On Sunday 09 July 2006 01:35, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> The illogical thing for me is: You ask to open a partition, you get
> back a structure that has half the properties of the partition, and
> the other half has the properties of the disk the partition is on.
I don't see this. When you open a par
