Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a patch that solves that. First I removed all the init and
> fini functions and let GRUB_MOD_INIT and GRUB_MOD_FINI generate these
> functions. I have added a script that creates a header file with all
> the function prototypes for these genera
Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 20 Oct 2005 15:47, Timothy Baldwin wrote:
>> Here is support for Linux/ADFS partition tables, which is used for Linux
>> partitions on discs connected to the motherboard interface of systems which
>> run RISC OS. Since it shares a structur
On Sunday 13 Nov 2005 16:03, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * include/grub/acorn_filecore.h: Likewise.
>
> I would prefer to move this to partmap/acorn.c. Or do you have to use
> this struct elsewhere?
Yes it's also used in disk/arm/RISC_OS/filecore.c,
In ARM GAS syntax "@" marks the start of comment, which breaks symbol.h. I
choose
double quotes as a replacement as they can't be used to start comments.
2005-11-13 Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix symbol.h for ARM.
* include/grub/symbol.h: (FUNCTION): Use double quotes
Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 13 Nov 2005 16:03, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * include/grub/acorn_filecore.h: Likewise.
>>
>> I would prefer to move this to partmap/acorn.c. Or do you have to use
>> this struct elsewhere?
Hi,
I want to write a little Multiboot-compliant x84-64 Kernel. Is there any
good way to boot it with GRUB Legacy? What are the plans for the future?
cu
Alita
--
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
--
Lust,
"Alita Friedrichsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Alita,
> I want to write a little Multiboot-compliant x84-64 Kernel. Is there any
> good way to boot it with GRUB Legacy? What are the plans for the future?
There are plans for a new multiboot. You could have a look at the
plans on the wiki:
Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In ARM GAS syntax "@" marks the start of comment, which breaks symbol.h. I
> choose
> double quotes as a replacement as they can't be used to start comments.
>
> 2005-11-13 Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fix symbol.h for ARM.
>
>
Since having to edit 4 rmk files every time a system independent change is made
is a bit silly, here is a patch to allow the common rules to be split off to
a shared file. I will submit a patch to do so later.
Also I add ".DELETE_ON_ERROR:" to make make delete targets if there is an
error buildin
Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since having to edit 4 rmk files every time a system independent change is
> made
> is a bit silly, here is a patch to allow the common rules to be split off to
> a shared file. I will submit a patch to do so later.
>
> Also I add ".DELETE_ON_ERROR:"
On Sunday 13 Nov 2005 21:04, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In ARM GAS syntax "@" marks the start of comment, which breaks symbol.h.
> > I choose double quotes as a replacement as they can't be used to start
> > comments.
> >
> > 2005-11-13 Timothy Baldwin
Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 13 Nov 2005 21:04, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Timothy Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > In ARM GAS syntax "@" marks the start of comment, which breaks symbol.h.
>> > I choose double quotes as a replacement as they can't be used to start
>
Hi Marco!
> There are plans for a new multiboot.
Oh, that sounds good. Protect the Multiboot information structure from
overwriting ist a realy hard job.
> This is all for GRUB 2. For GRUB Legacy this just won't happen, I
> think.
But how log does it take before I can use it? GRUB Legacy comes
"Alita Friedrichsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Marco!
>
>> There are plans for a new multiboot.
>
> Oh, that sounds good. Protect the Multiboot information structure from
> overwriting ist a realy hard job.
>
>> This is all for GRUB 2. For GRUB Legacy this just won't happen, I
>> think.
>
"Timothy St. Clair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there support (patches or otherwise) for DiskOnChip in the grub2
> development branch?
No, there is no such support. Perhaps it will just work if the BIOS
exports the disk as either a floppy or harddisk drive. In that case
you just have to te
Hi Marco!
> You could have a look at the archives of the list. IIRC there was a
> patch for 64 bits ELFs that was applied to GRUB 2. That is for the
> current multiboot. Perhaps that's enough for you.
Yes, thanks. But this Patch first is not Multiboot-compliant und secondly
does not work with
"Alita Friedrichsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Marco!
>
>> You could have a look at the archives of the list. IIRC there was a
>> patch for 64 bits ELFs that was applied to GRUB 2. That is for the
>> current multiboot. Perhaps that's enough for you.
>
> Yes, thanks. But this Patch first
On Sunday 13 Nov 2005 22:01, Alita Friedrichsen wrote:
> So I'm looking for a preferably good way to boot my Kernel with the current
> Multiboot Specification.
Your kernel will have to switch to 64 bit mode itself, if using GRUB Legacy.
--
Member AFFS, WYLUG, SWP (UK), UAF, RESPECT, StWC
No to
Hallo Timothy!
> Your kernel will have to switch to 64 bit mode itself, if using GRUB
> Legacy.
Sure, but what is the best way to link the 64-Bit Code in to the 32-Bit ELF?
Or is it better to use a.out?
cu
Alita
--
Highspeed-Freiheit. Bei GMX supergünstig, z.B. GMX DSL_Cityflat,
DSL-Flatrate f
Hello,
It looks to me like there is a memory leak in grub_command_find:
grub_command_t
grub_command_find (char *cmdline)
{
...
again:
for (cmd = grub_command_list; cmd; cmd = cmd->next)
if (grub_strcmp (cmdline, cmd->name) == 0)
break;
if (! cmd)
grub_error (GRUB_ERR_UNKNOW
20 matches
Mail list logo
