Re: multiboot2: kernel->GRUB communication

2006-11-15 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Right now the multiboot2 spec calls for bits to be set in the kernel > > image to indicate to GRUB that various features are required or > > requested. > > > > I'm trying to come up wi

Re: multiboot2: kernel->GRUB communication

2006-11-15 Thread tgingold
Quoting Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Right now the multiboot2 spec calls for bits to be set in the kernel > image to indicate to GRUB that various features are required or > requested. > > I'm trying to come up with a cleaner way. I find all these bits very > confusing, actually, and I

multiboot2: kernel->GRUB communication

2006-11-14 Thread Hollis Blanchard
Right now the multiboot2 spec calls for bits to be set in the kernel image to indicate to GRUB that various features are required or requested. I'm trying to come up with a cleaner way. I find all these bits very confusing, actually, and I think it would be more clear if we had something like this