Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 20:56 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:51:41PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:22:36PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:51:41PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:22:36PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Sep 06,
Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:22:36PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > >> Currently grub-mkconfi
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:22:36PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
> >> Wouldn't it be bet
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 20:21 -0500 schrieb richardvo...@gmail.com:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >>> Currently grub-mkconfig
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>>> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
>>> Wouldn't it be better to use 4
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:17:34PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:58:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok here's now a patch.
> > > Robert do you think this can go into 1.97?
> >
> > For 1.97 I
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
>> Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
>> support?
>> Or should we add supp
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:58:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >
> > Ok here's now a patch.
> > Robert do you think this can go into 1.97?
>
> For 1.97 I'd be more comfortable with a simple s/444/400/. An automated check
> smells
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:58:40PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> Ok here's now a patch.
> Robert do you think this can go into 1.97?
For 1.97 I'd be more comfortable with a simple s/444/400/. An automated check
smells like it could have corner cases. In fact I found one:
> @@ -260,6 +260,11
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:38:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> A GRUB_CHMOD
> variable seems overkill, though.
Yes. Please not a new config option just for this. Just pick a reasonable
mode and set to it.
Auto-detection doesn't sound bad, although I'd be fine with just using
0400.
> > Else
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:57 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:43:46PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > > I think it'd be more sensible to do this in grub-mkconfig itself - it
> > > doesn't really fit well
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:43:46PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > I think it'd be more sensible to do this in grub-mkconfig itself - it
> > doesn't really fit well into the /etc/grub.d/ hook system, which is
> > really just for genera
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
> > Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
> > support?
> > Or shou
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
> Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
> support?
> Or should we add support for a GRUB_CHMOD variable so users can override
> this
Currently grub-mkconfig uses chmod 444 on the newly generated grub.cfg
Wouldn't it be better to use 400 now that we have plaintext password
support?
Or should we add support for a GRUB_CHMOD variable so users can override
this setting as they please?
Else I'd need to add a /etc/grub.d/999_chmod fi
16 matches
Mail list logo