On 7/15/21 8:11 PM, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response.
> I did try with the latest change, but still observing "shim_lock protocol
> not found" error. For " grub-mkimage", the option " --disable-shim-lock" is
> used.
>
Thanks for testing.
Dmitry, any idea why header->
protocol not found.
script/script.c:65: free 0x81fff4a6e0
>-Original Message-
>From: Javier Martinez Canillas
>Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 8:43 PM
>To: Sayanta Pattanayak ; Daniel Kiper
>
>Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org; nd ; x...@ubuntu.com;
>pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviai
On 7/15/21 4:43 PM, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> I tried with your suggested change, but observing Exception as following -
>
Thanks for testing.
[snip]
>
> Synchronous Exception at 0xF92699DC
> Synchronous Exception at 0xF92699DC
Hmm, I found another bug in th
u.com;
>pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviainc.com
>Subject: Re: UEFI Secureboot not succeeding with Grub 2.06 and later version
>
>Hello Sayanta,
>
>On 7/15/21 7:26 AM, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>>> We understand LoadImage() interface is used in our plat
Hello Sayanta,
On 7/15/21 7:26 AM, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
[snip]
>>> We understand LoadImage() interface is used in our platform, but if
>>> the error scenario is not expected with LoadImage() interface then we
>>> need further investigation. We are trying to look into it.
>>>
I agree with t
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Kiper
>Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 6:45 PM
>To: Sayanta Pattanayak
>Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org; nd ; javi...@redhat.com;
>x...@ubuntu.com; pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviainc.com
>Subject: Re: UEFI Secureboot not succeeding with Grub 2
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 04:20:56PM +, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Secureboot worked fine with the change(GRUB_FILE_TYPE_LINUX_KERNEL ->
> GRUB_FILE_TYPE_NONE) you suggested.
Great!
> disk/efi/efidisk.c:531: opening hd0 succeeded
> partmap/gpt.c:93: Read a valid GPT header
> pa
secureboot on with grub&kernel going
into lockdown without any extra steps or code.
So we probably have a bug somewhere, as others have started to triage
already.
> Thanks,
>
> Sayanta
>
> *From:* Dimitri John Ledkov
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 8, 2021 4:21 PM
> *To:*
8, 2021 4:21 PM
To: Sayanta Pattanayak
Cc: The development of GNU GRUB ; nd
Subject: Re: UEFI Secureboot not succeeding with Grub 2.06 and later version
Hi,
The below mentioned commands are useful. Hence we need to debug this further
and establish further details about your setup.
1) which
nd ; javi...@redhat.com;
>x...@ubuntu.com; pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviainc.com
>Subject: Re: UEFI Secureboot not succeeding with Grub 2.06 and later version
>
>On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 07:04:46AM +, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply and hope y
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 03:31:15PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 08:01:31PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > Hi Dimitri,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:51:25AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The below mentioned commands are useful. H
signed
> > > binaries.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 8 Jul 2021, 08:05 Sayanta Pattanayak, <
> > sayanta.pattana...@arm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply and hope you had a great
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 08:01:31PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:51:25AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The below mentioned commands are useful. Hence we need to debug this
> > further and establish further details about y
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 07:04:46AM +, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your reply and hope you had a great vacation.
Yeah, I had nice time.
> We use Upstream 2.06 tagged version. Mentioning below the Build Commands and
> Console Output.
Thanks! Please look below.
[...]
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021, 08:05 Sayanta Pattanayak, <
> sayanta.pattana...@arm.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply and hope you had a great vacation.
> > > We use Upstream 2.06 tagged version. Mentioning below the Build
>
---Original Message-
> > >From: Daniel Kiper
> > >Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 6:45 PM
> > >To: Sayanta Pattanayak
> > >Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org; nd ; javi...@redhat.com;
> > >x...@ubuntu.com; pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviainc.com
> > >Subject: Re: UEF
gt; >From: Daniel Kiper
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 6:45 PM
> >To: Sayanta Pattanayak
> >Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org; nd ; javi...@redhat.com;
> >x...@ubuntu.com; pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviainc.com
> >Subject: Re: UEFI Secureboot not succeeding with Grub 2.06 and lat
;Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org; nd ; javi...@redhat.com;
>x...@ubuntu.com; pjo...@redhat.com; l...@nuviainc.com
>Subject: Re: UEFI Secureboot not succeeding with Grub 2.06 and later version
>
>Hi Sayanta,
>
>Sorry for late reply but I am just recovering after vacation...
>
>CC-ing Jav
Hi Sayanta,
Sorry for late reply but I am just recovering after vacation...
CC-ing Javier, Dimitri, Peter and Leif.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 03:23:03PM +, Sayanta Pattanayak wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am new to grub and UEFI secure boot and so a beginners question.
> UEFI secureboot on a Arm64 plat
Hi All,
I am new to grub and UEFI secure boot and so a beginners question. UEFI
secureboot on a Arm64 platform works fine with Grub 2.04 version. The linux
kernel image is authenticated and loaded. But the same with Grub 2.06 version
does not progress - following error messages are displayed.
e
20 matches
Mail list logo
