On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 02:19:27AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 11:53 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > Some of our commands use --no-floppy. Also supported in GRUB Legacy (by
> > 'find'
> > or so, can't remember). Perhaps it's better to use that for consistency?
> > It
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 11:53 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Some of our commands use --no-floppy. Also supported in GRUB Legacy (by
> 'find'
> or so, can't remember). Perhaps it's better to use that for consistency? It
> is the floppy scan which everyone hates; for other devices I don't think
>
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 05:56:59PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> >On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:06:30PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> >>Robert Millan wrote:
> >>>Some of our commands use --no-floppy. Also supported in GRUB Legacy (by
> >>>'find'
> >>>or so, can't remember). Per
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:06:30PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Some of our commands use --no-floppy. Also supported in GRUB Legacy (by
'find'
or so, can't remember). Perhaps it's better to use that for consistency?
It
is the floppy scan which everyo
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:43:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>>
>> BTW, if you merely need to change the scan order instead of disabling
>> it, you can just change the order the device is reported in biosdisk.
>
> Sounds nice. I s
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:43:13PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> BTW, if you merely need to change the scan order instead of disabling
> it, you can just change the order the device is reported in biosdisk.
Sounds nice. I see you already included this change with your patch in
the "findroot" thread. D
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:06:30PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> >Some of our commands use --no-floppy. Also supported in GRUB Legacy (by
> >'find'
> >or so, can't remember). Perhaps it's better to use that for consistency?
> >It
> >is the floppy scan which everyone hates
Robert Millan wrote:
Some of our commands use --no-floppy. Also supported in GRUB Legacy (by 'find'
or so, can't remember). Perhaps it's better to use that for consistency? It
is the floppy scan which everyone hates; for other devices I don't think
people will mind if GRUB spends a few ms on t
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:38:07PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > An old system with a floppy drive has a minor regression with the
> > current GRUB. It makes some noises for a second or two when GRUB loads,
> > appa
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> An old system with a floppy drive has a minor regression with the
>> current GRUB. It makes some noises for a second or two when GRUB loads,
>
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> An old system with a floppy drive has a minor regression with the
> current GRUB. It makes some noises for a second or two when GRUB loads,
> apparently trying to find a floppy disk in the drive.
>
> It's possibl
Hello!
An old system with a floppy drive has a minor regression with the
current GRUB. It makes some noises for a second or two when GRUB loads,
apparently trying to find a floppy disk in the drive.
It's possible that some misconfigured systems may even hang or wait for
a long time if the floppy
12 matches
Mail list logo