Re: Respect EFI block-io buffer alignment

2016-02-17 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 17.02.2016 18:00, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 17.02.2016 19:23, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: >> On 17.02.2016 16:48, Leif Lindholm wrote: >>> This resolves a complete failure to access devices connected to the >>> SATA port on the ARM ltd. Juno platform (apart from a violation of t

Re: Respect EFI block-io buffer alignment

2016-02-17 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
17.02.2016 19:23, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > On 17.02.2016 16:48, Leif Lindholm wrote: >> This resolves a complete failure to access devices connected to the >> SATA port on the ARM ltd. Juno platform (apart from a violation of the >> UEFI block io protocol). >> >> The below is

Re: Respect EFI block-io buffer alignment

2016-02-17 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 17.02.2016 16:48, Leif Lindholm wrote: > This resolves a complete failure to access devices connected to the > SATA port on the ARM ltd. Juno platform (apart from a violation of the > UEFI block io protocol). > > The below is a bit of a hack, but I'd like some feedback on preferred > solution b

Respect EFI block-io buffer alignment

2016-02-17 Thread Leif Lindholm
This resolves a complete failure to access devices connected to the SATA port on the ARM ltd. Juno platform (apart from a violation of the UEFI block io protocol). The below is a bit of a hack, but I'd like some feedback on preferred solution before over(or under)engineering something. As far as