On Thursday 03 January 2008 02:08, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:55:37AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I wouldn't like to run the risk of missing legitimate mail, specially in
> > this case that blocking spam is just a matter of restricting who can post
> > to commit-grub (lik
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:19:20PM -0500, Gregg C Levine wrote:
> Hello!
> Who's the list-admin for commit-grub? I am thinking I can take that cover
> for a few weeks and see what happens. And what about resetting the list so
> that it requires a moderator to accept all posts, that way if something
opment of GRUB 2
> Subject: Re: spam in commit-grub
>
> On Monday 31 December 2007 15:26, Robert Millan wrote:
> > There's spam in commit-grub. Could posting be restricted to mail
> > originating from Savannah ? The envelope sender seems to always be
> > of the f
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:55:37AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I wouldn't like to run the risk of missing legitimate mail, specially in this
> case that blocking spam is just a matter of restricting who can post to
> commit-grub (like it happens on this list, which thankfuly is completely
> spam-
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:20:59AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Monday 31 December 2007 15:26, Robert Millan wrote:
> > There's spam in commit-grub. Could posting be restricted to mail
> > originating from Savannah ? The envelope sender seems to always be
> > of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Monday 31 December 2007 15:26, Robert Millan wrote:
> There's spam in commit-grub. Could posting be restricted to mail
> originating from Savannah ? The envelope sender seems to always be
> of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which spam? I can't figure out what mail you meant. Maybe because I have