At Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:59:30 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
>
>
> How is it that util/biosdisk.c makes effort to avoid including Linux headers
> and defines Linux ioctl macros on its own?
>
> This adds an extra maintainance burden, so I guess there must be a reason to
> do
> it, but can't think of
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:59:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> How is it that util/biosdisk.c makes effort to avoid including Linux headers
> and defines Linux ioctl macros on its own?
>
> This adds an extra maintainance burden, so I guess there must be a reason to
> do
> it, but can't think
