Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:39:04PM +0300, Constantine Kousoulos wrote: > Jerone, thanks to your instructions grub2 was installed > automagically!! > > The only thing that wasn't set up automatically was grub.cfg but > this is a minor issue to resolve. You can use update-grub for that. -- Robe

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-29 Thread Constantine Kousoulos
Jerone, thanks to your instructions grub2 was installed automagically!! The only thing that wasn't set up automatically was grub.cfg but this is a minor issue to resolve. Are there any objections to replace the wiki's inaccurate instructions at the section "TestingOnX86/Installing GRUB 2 int

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-29 Thread Constantine Kousoulos
Thank you for your reply. After so much time, i had totally given up on grub2. I have a debian-amd64/unstable system running on a turion64 processor with gcc 4.1.3, autoconf 2.61 and automake 1.10. I will try again to install grub2 using your instructions and report back. Constantine ___

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-28 Thread Jerone Young
Ok.. moving over to ubuntu (fiesty) it appears things do work (once you have all the 32bit shared libs installed). Wow... I was basically spinning my wheels for a bit there. I don't appear to have a problem with the binaries though. I will show what I did: 1) ./configure --program-transform-name

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-27 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
At Sat, 26 May 2007 19:44:09 -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > Really..exactly waht distro and gcc version are you using. There is > still lack for _start with compiling 32-bit binaries using gcc x86-64. > I'm currently been testing on Fedora Core 7 beta and I see the problem > consistently (though I

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-26 Thread Jerone Young
Really..exactly waht distro and gcc version are you using. There is still lack for _start with compiling 32-bit binaries using gcc x86-64. I'm currently been testing on Fedora Core 7 beta and I see the problem consistently (though I do need to update it some). Others have reported the problem in t

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-26 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
At Sat, 26 May 2007 18:14:23 -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > Are you sure you did this on an x86-64 install. Current CVS still > suffers from the not being able to properly compile on x86-64 systems. It compiles fine here... are you sure your compiler can generate 32-bit code? Jeroen Dekkers __

Re: installing on x86_64

2007-05-26 Thread Jerone Young
Are you sure you did this on an x86-64 install. Current CVS still suffers from the not being able to properly compile on x86-64 systems. I am looking into it again now, but I think you may be mistaken in how you are using it? What distro & gcc version are you using ? On 5/22/07, Constantine Kouso