Re: grub.info

On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:43:52AM -0500, Bruce O. Benson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > This is the typical problem of contributing complaints vs. code. > > > > Bruce, there's absolutely no problem with Vladimir helping with review of > > code, documentatio

Re: grub.info

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Robert Millan wrote: > > This is the typical problem of contributing complaints vs. code. > > Bruce, there's absolutely no problem with Vladimir helping with review of > code, documentation and proposals in general. In fact, I find this very > helpful. > > You too

Re: grub.info

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 01:04:47PM -0500, Bruce O. Benson wrote: > 2009/12/31 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > > > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > > > > > 2009/12/30 Bruce Dubbs > > > > > > > > > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > > All contributors can safely, legall

Re: grub.info

2009/12/31 Bruce O. Benson : > > 2009/12/31 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko >> >> Bruce O. Benson wrote: >> > >> > 2009/12/30 Bruce Dubbs > > > >> > >> >     Bruce O. Benson wrote: >> > All contributors can safely, legally add/merge/move stuff there if >> > desi

Re: grub.info

2009/12/31 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > > > 2009/12/30 Bruce Dubbs > > > > > > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > All contributors can safely, legally add/merge/move stuff there if > > desired, delete anything/everything I wrote, ad

Re: grub.info

Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > >> If the brz repo guys want to use another manual, then perhaps the >> wiki page >> could be moved to "QuickStart" or something fitting. > > Ideally, the wiki 'Manual' page and the info document would track each > other. I don't know how copyright iss

Re: grub.info

Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > >> If I: >> - ...merged the contents of both existing documents into a new one... >> - ...that adhered to the outline you enumerated... >> - ...assigned copyright to FSF... >> - ...rendered in texi, html, and pdf. >> >> ...Would that be useful for someo

Re: grub.info

Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > 2009/12/30 Bruce Dubbs > > > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > If the brz repo guys want to use another manual, then perhaps > the wiki page > could be moved to "QuickStart" or something fitting. > > > Ideally, the w

Re: grub.info

2009/12/30 Bruce Dubbs > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > If the brz repo guys want to use another manual, then perhaps the wiki >> page >> could be moved to "QuickStart" or something fitting. >> > > Ideally, the wiki 'Manual' page and the info document would track each > other. I don't know how copy

Re: grub.info

Bruce O. Benson wrote: If the brz repo guys want to use another manual, then perhaps the wiki page could be moved to "QuickStart" or something fitting. Ideally, the wiki 'Manual' page and the info document would track each other. I don't know how copyright issues would be handled though.

Re: grub.info

2009/12/30 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > > > ...Would that be useful for someone to check in to trunk/docs? I > > don't wanna get deep into a piece of work like that if it's not wanted. > > > Be careful when merging with documents from wiki. Don't use conte

Re: grub.info

Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > > 2009/12/29 Bruce Dubbs > > > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it > currently has the > structure below. I also did some research and propose >

Re: grub.info

Am Dienstag, den 29.12.2009, 21:39 -0500 schrieb Bruce O. Benson: > > Someone on the list can chime in if they want and are able to check my > work in to svn (in whole or part). Then I can release copyright. It works the other way. You have to first assign copyright to FSF before we can commit

Re: grub.info

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > If I: >> - ...merged the contents of both existing documents into a new one... >> - ...that adhered to the outline you enumerated... >> - ...assigned copyright to FSF... >> - ...rendered in texi, html, and pdf. >>

Re: grub.info

Bruce O. Benson wrote: If I: - ...merged the contents of both existing documents into a new one... - ...that adhered to the outline you enumerated... - ...assigned copyright to FSF... - ...rendered in texi, html, and pdf. ...Would that be useful for someone to check in to trunk/docs? I don't w

Re: grub.info

2009/12/29 Bruce Dubbs > Bruce O. Benson wrote: > > I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently has the structure below. I also did some research and propose a different layout, also shown below. >>> >> The current layout of the grub2 manual is actually here: >>

Re: grub.info

Bruce O. Benson wrote: I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently has the structure below. I also did some research and propose a different layout, also shown below. The current layout of the grub2 manual is actually here: http://grub.enbug.org/Manual From one Bruce to an

Re: grub.info

2009/12/3 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > > > > I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently has the > > structure below. I also did some research and propose a different > > layout, also shown below. > The current layout of the grub2 manual is actually here: http://gru

Re: grub.info

> I took a look at grub.texi. Although I haven't written any texi files > before, I was able to figure out the format and run makeinfo without > any errors. That means that I only have to worry about small things > like content. :) > > I have examined the hierarchy of the manual and it currently

Re: grub.info

Looks good, IMHO. I would also add a section on migration from Legacy GRUB to GRUB2 (including examples of converting a number of different menu.lst configurations to grub.cfg configurations). --S Quoting Bruce Dubbs, who wrote the following on Wed, 2 Dec 2009: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Vlad