Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 22:09 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:33:25PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 21:39 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> > > Serbinenko:
> > > > Don't
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:33:25PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 21:39 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> > Serbinenko:
> > > Don't we already have a function which transforms host directory into
> > > gr
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 21:39 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko:
> > Don't we already have a function which transforms host directory into
> > grub
> > directory? AFAIR we have.
>
> There's just the shell function in
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 12:21 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:28 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> > Ok here's a new one which compiles without warnings.
>
> I suggest that whenever a patch is published, it comes with a detailed
> description. Surely, it could be gathere
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:28 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Ok here's a new one which compiles without warnings.
I suggest that whenever a patch is published, it comes with a detailed
description. Surely, it could be gathered by rereading the thread, but
I think it's not sufficient for two reasons
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 01:25 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 01:21 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> > > Serbinenko:
> > >
>
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 01:21 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> > Serbinenko:
> >
> > > +
> > > +char *grub_make_system_path_relative_to_its_root (char *path
Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko:
>
> > +
> > +char *grub_make_system_path_relative_to_its_root (char *path)
> > +{
> > +
> > + struct stat st;
> > + char buf[500], buf2[500];
> >
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> +
> +char *grub_make_system_path_relative_to_its_root (char *path)
> +{
> +
> + struct stat st;
> + char buf[500], buf2[500];
> Use malloc instead of static allocation
Changed.
> + p = strrchr (buf, '/');
>
2009-06-08 Felix Zielcke
* include/grub/util/hostdisk.c
(grub_make_system_path_relative_to_its_root): New function
prototype.
* util/hostdisk.c (grub_make_system_path_relative_to_its_root):
New function.
* util/i386/pc/grub
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 21:39 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko:
> > Don't we already have a function which transforms host directory into
> > grub
> > directory? AFAIR we have.
>
> There's just the shell function in
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> Don't we already have a function which transforms host directory into
> grub
> directory? AFAIR we have.
There's just the shell function in grub-mkconfig_lib.in
Here's now a patch wich implements it in util/hostdisk.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> grub-install with some --root-directory option and a partition given as
> setup device and not a whole disk doestn't work, i.e. blocklists are
> used.
> grub-setup fails that it can't find the core.img.
>
> The problem are the
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 04:55 am, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Upon further inspection, this part of grub-install is identical to the
> x86 grub-install behavior. On both architectures,
> grub-install --root-directory /foo
> will install *.mod, *.lst, and the output of grub-mkimage into
>
On Nov 16, 2005, at 10:17 PM, Mike Small wrote:
2. The script seems to assume that /boot/grub/ will be where my boot
partition is mounted. This was mentioned in the original mail, and I
could set things up this way, but in my opinion it would be more
natural to be able to specify the install di
15 matches
Mail list logo
