At Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:06:29 +0100,
Robert Millan wrote:
> Thanks. I just fixed it.
I've tested it and it seems to work.
Thanks,
Neal
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:01:30PM +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:41:47 +0100,
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > I will try. Does someone have a known-working Multiboot / ELF64 image I can
> > test with?
>
> You can try Viengoos:
>
> http://plato.walfield.org/viengoos
>
>
>
At Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:41:47 +0100,
Robert Millan wrote:
> I will try. Does someone have a known-working Multiboot / ELF64 image I can
> test with?
You can try Viengoos:
http://plato.walfield.org/viengoos
Here is a grub.cfg menu entry:
menuentry "Viengoos" {
multiboot /viengoos -D 3
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:27:27AM +0100, phcoder wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The problem with elf64 in our multiboot loader is that it duplicates a lot
>> of code from elf32 and this eventually leads to bitrot.
>>
>> In fact, grub_multiboot_load_elf32 and grub_multiboot_load_elf64 a
Robert Millan wrote:
Hi,
The problem with elf64 in our multiboot loader is that it duplicates a lot
of code from elf32 and this eventually leads to bitrot.
In fact, grub_multiboot_load_elf32 and grub_multiboot_load_elf64 are supposed
to be almost identical, and only differ in s/32/64/ reference
Hi,
The problem with elf64 in our multiboot loader is that it duplicates a lot
of code from elf32 and this eventually leads to bitrot.
In fact, grub_multiboot_load_elf32 and grub_multiboot_load_elf64 are supposed
to be almost identical, and only differ in s/32/64/ references.
It'd be fairly sim
