06.11.2015 22:59, Tim Walberg пишет:
On 11/06/2015 21:26 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
06.11.2015 19:08, Tim Walberg ??:
>On some relatively large systems that are used for virtualization,
>often containing upwards of 100 virtual machines, we've started running
On 11/06/2015 21:26 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 06.11.2015 19:08, Tim Walberg ??:
>> >On some relatively large systems that are used for virtualization,
>> >often containing upwards of 100 virtual machines, we've started running
>> >into issues with GRUB not being
06.11.2015 19:08, Tim Walberg пишет:
On some relatively large systems that are used for virtualization,
often containing upwards of 100 virtual machines, we've started running
into issues with GRUB not being able to install on a new virtual machine
(using the typical process of mounting all the V
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:54:19PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
Hi,
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[s/bug-grub/grub-devel/]
What does everyone think?
IIRC Okuji wants to remain using bug-grub for our bugs. If not, we
should change this IMO.
I'd like to rema
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:54:19PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [s/bug-grub/grub-devel/]
>
> > What does everyone think?
>
> IIRC Okuji wants to remain using bug-grub for our bugs. If not, we
> should change this IMO.
I'd like to remain u
Hi,
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[s/bug-grub/grub-devel/]
> What does everyone think?
IIRC Okuji wants to remain using bug-grub for our bugs. If not, we
should change this IMO.
--
Marco
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
Hello grub-devels,
Am Samstag, den 19.07.2008, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> Hi,
>
> Marco and I had an interesting discussion about bug-grub today:
>
> 15:54 < marco_g> nyu: Actually, I rarely look at the BTS
> 15:54 < marco_g> The list is a better way to process patches, IMO.
> 15:55 <
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:58:26AM -0400, Gregg Levine wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Why I am inclined to think is that the Bug-Grub list should be allowed
> to continue for as long as there are available binary blobs and source
> code ones for the original Grub-Legacy.
But we don't really provide support
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Marco and I had an interesting discussion about bug-grub today:
>
> 15:54 < marco_g> nyu: Actually, I rarely look at the BTS
> 15:54 < marco_g> The list is a better way to process patches, IMO.
> 15:55 < nyu> mar
On Thursday 20 July 2006 05:35, Mao, Bibo wrote:
> In function kern/efi/mm.c, macro MEMORY_MAP_SIZE is defined as
> 0x1000, on some platform, its memory map size is larger than
> MEMORY_MAP_SIZE. And there is another function find_mmap_size which is
> defined in loader/i386/efi/linux.c , I do
10 matches
Mail list logo
