On Feb 6, 2008 11:32 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > * loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c (grub_multiboot_load_elf32): Get physical
> > address of entry.
> > (grub_multiboot_load_elf64): Likewise.
> > (grub
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> * loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c (grub_multiboot_load_elf32): Get physical
> address of entry.
> (grub_multiboot_load_elf64): Likewise.
> (grub_multiboot): Initialize mbi structure.
>
>
> diff --git a/loader/i386/pc/mu
Committed.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Jan 28, 2008 9:00 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Jan 28, 2008 9:54 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 28, 2008 9:54 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
>> ...
>> > > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel, i don't a
>> > > > a bsd system at hand
>>
>> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~w
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:06:51PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> grub-probe is nice, but i normally use grub-fstest to debug fs
> problem, because it have more options.
Ah, I noticed grub-fstest is not in CVS yet. I'll comment on your patch now..
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone c
On Jan 28, 2008 4:57 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:24:57PM -0800, walt wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes! I just discovered that I can multiboot the netbsd kernel off
> >> of a FAT32 fs or even an NTFS fs, but *not* off
On Jan 28, 2008 9:54 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
> ...
> > > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel, i don't a
> > > > a bsd system at hand
>
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~wa1ter/ufs.gz
>
> I included a small text fi
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:24:57PM -0800, walt wrote:
>>
>> Yes! I just discovered that I can multiboot the netbsd kernel off
>> of a FAT32 fs or even an NTFS fs, but *not* off of a UFS fs :o/
>>
>> Apparently "something bad" happens to the kernel in
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:54:26PM -0800, walt wrote:
>
> Heh. I'm assuming an .rmk file involves ruby somehow? The bonehead
> build process that I'm using doesn't turn an .rmk into a .mk AFAICT,
> but I'd like to know how to do it.
Try ./autogen.sh
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:25 +0800, Bean wrote:
...
> > > please make a small ufs image containing the netbsd kernel, i don't a
> > > a bsd system at hand
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~wa1ter/ufs.gz
I included a small text file (motd) to demonstrate that you can cat it
okay, but when you try 'mul
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:09:20PM -0800, walt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 09:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > I just committed a check in grub-probe that attempts to read and verify
> > files
> > using GRUB filesystems and compares them with output from your system. E.g.
> > if you do
On Jan 28, 2008 4:13 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 09:35 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 2008 5:24 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Apparently "something bad" happens to the kernel in the process of
> > > reading or loading it from the UFS fs. I can
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 09:35 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2008 5:24 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently "something bad" happens to the kernel in the process of
> > reading or loading it from the UFS fs. I can read small text files
> > from a UFS fs, however, so I'm thinking m
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 09:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I just committed a check in grub-probe that attempts to read and verify files
> using GRUB filesystems and compares them with output from your system. E.g.
> if you do: grub-probe -t fs /full/path/to/file it will compare and verify it
>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:24:57PM -0800, walt wrote:
>
> Yes! I just discovered that I can multiboot the netbsd kernel off
> of a FAT32 fs or even an NTFS fs, but *not* off of a UFS fs :o/
>
> Apparently "something bad" happens to the kernel in the process of
> reading or loading it from the UF
On Jan 27, 2008 5:24 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 23:01 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > this is the patch, problems found:
> >
> > 1, the mbi structure is not initialized to all zeros, this means some
> > important member, like mods_count, will contain trash.
> > 2, the entr
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 23:01 +0800, Bean wrote:
> this is the patch, problems found:
>
> 1, the mbi structure is not initialized to all zeros, this means some
> important member, like mods_count, will contain trash.
> 2, the entry point in the header is virtual address, we need to
> translate it t
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:19:36AM -0800, walt wrote:
> > Btw it won't apply to CVS head; maybe it was scrambled when sending it?
>
> I had to use the -l flag to get it to apply, but it did apply okay.
Ah, didn't know about this flag. Sounds useful!
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:24:16AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > Indeed! Unfortunately I still get the same free magic is broken :o(
> > As an experiment, I g-zipped the kernel and now grub2 just reboots
> > without printing anything when I do multiboot /netbsd.gz. (The same
> > kernel still boots n
On Jan 27, 2008 2:24 AM, Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2008 2:19 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 18:24 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > > this is the patch, problems found:
> > > >
> > > >
On Jan 27, 2008 2:19 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 18:24 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > this is the patch, problems found:
> > >
> > > 1, the mbi structure is not initialized to all zeros, this means some
>
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 18:24 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > this is the patch, problems found:
> >
> > 1, the mbi structure is not initialized to all zeros, this means some
> > important member, like mods_count, will contain trash.
> > 2, th
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:01:49PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> this is the patch, problems found:
>
> 1, the mbi structure is not initialized to all zeros, this means some
> important member, like mods_count, will contain trash.
> 2, the entry point in the header is virtual address, we need to
> translat
this is the patch, problems found:
1, the mbi structure is not initialized to all zeros, this means some
important member, like mods_count, will contain trash.
2, the entry point in the header is virtual address, we need to
translate it to physical address.
* loader/i386/pc/multiboot.c (g
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:47:52AM -0800, walt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 15:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Btw, if you put that kernel image somewhere, chances are higher that someone
> > gives it a try...
>
> http://rapidshare.com/files/86269193/netbsd.html
Ouch, what an horrid downl
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 15:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, if you put that kernel image somewhere, chances are higher that someone
> gives it a try...
http://rapidshare.com/files/86269193/netbsd.html
grub2 will certainly get fixed faster if one of you does the fixing :o)
___
Btw, if you put that kernel image somewhere, chances are higher that someone
gives it a try. Setting up a NetBSD system (and figuring out how to play with
kernel options) just to test that can be too much of a hassle for most of us.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
Wh
28 matches
Mail list logo
