Am Mittwoch, den 15.04.2009, 00:35 +0900 schrieb Yoshinori K. Okuji:
>
> Well, it was not only about ruby, but also about autoconf. Anyway, if someone
> updates the INSTALL file appropriately, I don't object.
>
Ok, I just removed configure,config.h.in,stamp-h.in,DISTLIST,conf/*.mk,
updated INS
On Monday 13 April 2009 23:30:42 Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 04:54:21PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > > phcoder wrote on Sunday 12 April 2009:
> > > > Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 01:47:49PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We could
> remove it. The main argument against it is that people will not be able
> to compile without installing a lot of developement tools. It changes
> nothing for th
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 04:54:21PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > phcoder wrote on Sunday 12 April 2009:
> > > Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We could
> > > remove it. The main argument against it is that pe
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> phcoder wrote on Sunday 12 April 2009:
> > Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We could
> > remove it. The main argument against it is that people will not be able
> > to compile without installing a lot of devel
phcoder wrote on Sunday 12 April 2009:
> Hello, we all know how annoying are these autogenerated files. We could
> remove it. The main argument against it is that people will not be able
> to compile without installing a lot of developement tools. It changes
> nothing for the users wanting to modif
