On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:47:10PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> >On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:42:00PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> >>Actually, you might want to use UUID or LABEL of the file system instead
> >>of device file name.
> >>
> >>You can get or set UUID or labe
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:42:00PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
Actually, you might want to use UUID or LABEL of the file system instead
of device file name.
You can get or set UUID or label with tune2fs like this:
# tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 (get information)
# tune2f
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:42:00PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> Actually, you might want to use UUID or LABEL of the file system instead
> of device file name.
>
> You can get or set UUID or label with tune2fs like this:
>
> # tune2fs -l /dev/sda1(get information)
> # tune2fs -L
Lubomir Rintel a écrit :
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 14:10 +0200, giggz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry If it isn't the right place to post...I don't find a grub users
>> list...
>>
>> I have several kernel on my laptop. Most of them are compiled by myself.
>> But to compare the performance I have an officia
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 14:10 +0200, giggz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry If it isn't the right place to post...I don't find a grub users
> list...
>
> I have several kernel on my laptop. Most of them are compiled by myself.
> But to compare the performance I have an official debian kernel (486).
> The pro
