Re: Proposal for GNU indent compatibility

2009-07-31 Thread Marco Gerards
Hi, Pavel Roskin writes: > In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly > added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent. > That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That's the only > difference I'm aware of. > > Running indent on the co

Re: Proposal for GNU indent compatibility

2009-06-21 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the > newly added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of > GNU indent. That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. > That's the only difference I'm aware of. What does GCS say about spaces after "!"

Re: Proposal for GNU indent compatibility

2009-06-21 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:37:20PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly > added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent. > That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That's the only > differe

Re: Proposal for GNU indent compatibility

2009-06-19 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:01 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > 8) Removed spaces before labels Oh, I missed that. I think we should follow GNU indent in the label placement as well. > it has put { on new line and without spacing > Perhaps something more. The patch would be 77280 line

Re: Proposal for GNU indent compatibility

2009-06-19 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly > added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent. I agree with proposition > > That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That