On Sunday 22 March 2009 21:50:22 Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 21:29:23 Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:01:35PM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > I will work towards this direction. I will first fix up the sector
> > > handling and change the format to
On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:23:53 phcoder wrote:
> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 March 2009 19:48:36 phcoder wrote:
> >> Hello, I agree that non-sector aligned writes should be handled
> >> correctly. However I disagree with removing of the magic number. I
> >> personally would prefer i
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Sunday 22 March 2009 19:48:36 phcoder wrote:
Hello, I agree that non-sector aligned writes should be handled
correctly. However I disagree with removing of the magic number. I
personally would prefer if this file would have magic number and
checksum. AFAIK currently
On Sunday 22 March 2009 19:48:36 phcoder wrote:
> Hello, I agree that non-sector aligned writes should be handled
> correctly. However I disagree with removing of the magic number. I
> personally would prefer if this file would have magic number and
> checksum. AFAIK currently grub2 doesn't write t
On Sunday 22 March 2009 21:29:23 Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:01:35PM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > I will work towards this direction. I will first fix up the sector
> > handling and change the format to plain text. Naming changes are quite
> > trivial, so they can be d
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:01:35PM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> I will work towards this direction. I will first fix up the sector handling
> and change the format to plain text. Naming changes are quite trivial, so
> they can be done later.
I notice some changes went in for the new imp
Hello, I agree that non-sector aligned writes should be handled
correctly. However I disagree with removing of the magic number. I
personally would prefer if this file would have magic number and
checksum. AFAIK currently grub2 doesn't write to FS except in
load_env/save_env so a bug in code ca
On Sunday 15 March 2009 14:52:05 Bean wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Friday 13 March 2009 21:23:19 phcoder wrote:
> >> Look at load_env/save_env commands and grub-editenv util
> >
> > Thanks. Now I really regret that I didn't find those additions earlier
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Friday 13 March 2009 21:23:19 phcoder wrote:
>> Look at load_env/save_env commands and grub-editenv util
>
> Thanks. Now I really regret that I didn't find those additions earlier.
>
> I do not like this implementation for the followi
On Friday 13 March 2009 21:23:19 phcoder wrote:
> Look at load_env/save_env commands and grub-editenv util
Thanks. Now I really regret that I didn't find those additions earlier.
I do not like this implementation for the following reasons:
- The saved file is not plain text, unlike GRUB Legacy.
Look at load_env/save_env commands and grub-editenv util
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Thursday 05 March 2009 05:59:52 Robert Millan wrote:
We don't need a complete match of all the GRUB Legacy features in order to
migrate. The things I identified as needed for migration in Debian are
listed her
On Thursday 05 March 2009 05:59:52 Robert Millan wrote:
> We don't need a complete match of all the GRUB Legacy features in order to
> migrate. The things I identified as needed for migration in Debian are
> listed here:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/GrubTransition
>
> I think Xen is fixed now thou
12 matches
Mail list logo
