On 09/22/2010 10:57 PM, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/9/23 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko :
>
>> On 09/22/2010 07:44 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:08:49PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>>>
On 09/22/2010 18:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Hi,
2010/9/23 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko :
> On 09/22/2010 07:44 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:08:49PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>>> On 09/22/2010 18:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>>
After all msdos partitions tables may only exist in MBR and extended
On 09/22/2010 07:44 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:08:49PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>
>> On 09/22/2010 18:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> After all msdos partitions tables may only exist in MBR and extended
>>> partitions
>>>
>> According to which
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:08:49PM +0200, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 18:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> After all msdos partitions tables may only exist in MBR and extended
>> partitions
>
> According to which standard?
Well, I think DOS and common practice.
Can you think of any OS th
On 09/22/2010 18:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
After all msdos partitions tables may only exist in MBR and extended
partitions
According to which standard?
Grégoire
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:19:22PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> This sounds like a bug in grub. It should not be looking for an EBR
> inside a non extended partition, so if there happens to be some old data
> there that looks like one, it should not matter.
Well it would appear that it does curre
On 9/21/2010 10:54 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> How to resolve this problem? According to fdisk the sda1 and sda3 partitions
>> are _not_ overlapping:
>> Additionally, does the same warning have to be repeated so many times for
>> every kernel entry???
>
> It did not say they overlapped. It s
On 09/21/2010 09:42 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
# file /tmp/sda3.mbr /tmp/sda3.mbr: x86 boot sector; GRand Unified
Bootloader, stage1 version 0x3, 1st sector stage2 0xdd29b38;
partition 1: ID=0x83, starthead 239, startsector 63, 35153937
sectors, extended partition table (last)\011, code offset 0x
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:29:35PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> I see my mistake of output file in my previous mail, it should read /dev/sda3
> instead
> of /tmp/sda3, right?
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda3 bs=512 count=1
Right.
--
Len Sorensen
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:18 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
> > So the solution is to blank out the first sector of /dev/sda3,
> >
> > dd if=/dev/null of=/tmp/sda3 bs=512 count=1
> >
> > to get rid of the warnings? Please confirm the command above is correct.
>
> Not quite.
>
> dd if=/dev/
On 09/21/10 09:13, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 09/21/10 03:31, Svante Signell wrote:
I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
only grub-devel.
Then subscribe to help-grub! It's not hard to do, and that list gets
less email than grub-devel these days so you shouldn't
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:42:14PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Yes, if I remember correctly, that's what I did some time ago, when
> installing a new disk for /home.
>
> > If so, then there is a chance that the first sector of sda3 contains
> > the old extended partition table, and grub probe m
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:54 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:31:16AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
> Is there any chance you used to have an extended partition as sda3 and
> then made a linux partition which is now sda3 and your new extended
> partition is sda4?
Ye
On 09/21/2010 16:54, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
What does improperly nested mean: overlapping, or something else?
How to resolve this problem? According to fdisk the sda1 and sda3 partitions
are _not_ overlapping:
Additionally, does the same warning have to be repeated so many times for every
ke
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:31:16AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
> only grub-devel.
>
> Can somebody please help me with the following problem:
> (I have asked on Debian lists, and also filed a bug #594158 but no
> response
On 09/21/2010 09:31, Svante Signell wrote:
When installing a new kernel or a new version of grub I get a
warning that /dev/sda1 (windows rescue) and /dev/sda3 (linux root /)
are improperly nested: /usr/sbin/grub-probe: warn: Discarding
improperly nested partition (hd1,msdos3,msdos1).
Assuming
On 09/21/10 03:31, Svante Signell wrote:
I should have posted to help-grub, but I am not subscribed to that list,
only grub-devel.
Then subscribe to help-grub! It's not hard to do, and that list gets
less email than grub-devel these days so you shouldn't be overwhelmed
with email...
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
