On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 07:11:11PM -0500, Bandan wrote:
> First thing's first; I finally realized while getting my daily dose of grub2
> that I had unintentionally tried to post my message in a wrong thread
> here :
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-01/msg00157.html
I already
You might want to have a look at lsmmap function
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Bandan wrote:
First thing's first; I finally realized while getting my daily dose of grub2
that I had unintentionally tried to post my message in a wrong thread
here :
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009
Hi!
>
> Uppermem is i386-bound. I propose more general format:
> meminfo [-l] [-s VAR]
Sounds good to me.
> Which outputs total amount of memory.
> If launched with -s VAR this value is stored to variable
> If launched with -v it outputs complete memory map
>
So, would meminfo be the equivalent of
Bandan wrote:
(sorry phcoder and Vesa Jääskeläinen ! ).
NP
Personally, I would like to start with "uppermem" as I have already
gone through the relevant code and it will be easier for me to start with
it.
Uppermem is i386-bound. I propose more general format:
meminfo [-l] [-s VAR]
Which outpu
