Re: Grub PARTUUID vs UUID

2013-11-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Oct 23, 2013, at 7:58 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:37 PM, FireIcer wrote: > >> I am looking at the impact in general with changing the grub-mkconfig >> scan not to pickup and update the grub.cfg with the UUID code but the >> PARTUUID code instead. > > grub doesn't req

Re: Grub PARTUUID vs UUID

2013-10-23 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
ter when using mkconfig to output the cfg file > maybe? > > Thanks > > f1r31c3r > > > > > -- > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:07:00 +0200 > From: Vladimir '?-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > To: grub-devel@g

Re: Grub PARTUUID vs UUID

2013-10-23 Thread Chris Murphy
On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:37 PM, FireIcer wrote: > I am looking at the impact in general with changing the grub-mkconfig > scan not to pickup and update the grub.cfg with the UUID code but the > PARTUUID code instead. grub doesn't require volume UUID, this is something that the kernel wants becaus

Re: Grub PARTUUID vs UUID

2013-10-23 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 24.10.2013 02:37, FireIcer wrote: > Hey > > I am looking at the impact in general with changing the grub-mkconfig > scan not to pickup and update the grub.cfg with the UUID code but the > PARTUUID code instead. > > At present the situation forces the user to enable a working initramfs > to wor