Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
>>>and if so, why?
>>>
>>>
>>My question: why not?
>>
>>
> I just created a simply dummy program and tried to compile it with a
> 64bit only compiler, cross-compiling or not, t
Marco Gerards wrote:
>Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>>
>>
>>
>>>* Add support for x86_64.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
>>and if so, why?
>>
>>
>My question: why not?
>
>
I just
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Cyril,
> yes I am a Solaris developer. [Open]Solaris x86 uses grub legacy to boot.
> And our plans for Polaris involve using GRUB2 in order to reuse as much
> code as possible. Multiboot naturally is a part of the game. And extending
> it to PPC arch i
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
>
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then b
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then build
> >> on PowerPC without issue now ?
> >>
> >
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
>> >
>>
>> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then build
>> on PowerPC without issue now ?
>>
>
> Should work [it did for me :) on Peg with Gentoo]
How does it work f
Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>
>>* Add support for x86_64.
>>
>
> I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
> and if so, why?
It does. And the reason is that it works like that for me. My
question: why not?
At the moment GR
On 10/16/05, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>* Add support for x86_64.
>
I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
and if so, why?
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On 10/16/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for
> > > me,
> > > but I am not sure I didn't miss something i
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for
> > me,
> > but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
>
> Right. I committed a patch that changed powerpc-iee
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for me,
> but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
Right. I committed a patch that changed powerpc-ieee1275.rmk, but it
seems that powerpc-ieee1275.mk was not regenerated.
On 10/15/05, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for me,
> but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
>
Thank you Cyril. You probably saved me a pile of time scratching my
head and wondering.
Denn
On 10/15/05, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the release of GRUB 1.91. This is the second of
> our prereleases leading up to GRUB 2.0. We encourage you to try it, as
> we have done a significant amount of work towards GRUB 2. Note that this
> release is mainly
15 matches
Mail list logo