On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:00:51AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>>> This is a big dissatisfier with pretty much everyone I've talked to
>>> who's needed help.
>>
>> Believe me, I'm annoyed by this problem too.
>
> Is that an approval I hear to get it in to 1.97? ;) .
Sorry, this seems like 1.98
Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Thu, 3 Sep 2009:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:30:31AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Thu, 3 Sep 2009:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:45:28PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
I know I've been anno
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:30:31AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>
>
> Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Thu, 3 Sep 2009:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:45:28PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I know I've been annoyed by this (as have many others I've talked to).
>>> Ho
Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Thu, 3 Sep 2009:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:45:28PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
I know I've been annoyed by this (as have many others I've talked to).
How about we enabling paging (set pager=1) automatically for the duration
of the help
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:45:28PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know I've been annoyed by this (as have many others I've talked to).
> How about we enabling paging (set pager=1) automatically for the duration
> of the help command, since it will inevitable scroll off of the screen
