03.11.2015 20:14, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
03.11.2015 20:10, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
Which platform is it? i386-pc, i386-efi or x86_64-efi? The behavior is
actually will defined, just different between cpu modes
i386-pc
BTW here are specs from Dell site
Intel® Pentium® 4 microp
03.11.2015 20:10, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
Which platform is it? i386-pc, i386-efi or x86_64-efi? The behavior is
actually will defined, just different between cpu modes
i386-pc
Le 3 nov. 2015 6:08 PM, "Andrei Borzenkov" a écrit :
03.11.2015 19:28, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Which platform is it? i386-pc, i386-efi or x86_64-efi? The behavior is
actually will defined, just different between cpu modes
Le 3 nov. 2015 6:08 PM, "Andrei Borzenkov" a écrit :
> 03.11.2015 19:28, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>
>> The code itself looks good but I'd like more details. R
03.11.2015 19:28, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
The code itself looks good but I'd like more details. Reading 0x
shouldn't cause reboot. Why does it?
That I do not know nor do I have access to system in question myself. I
sent user patch that modified validate_header to do each
The code itself looks good but I'd like more details. Reading 0x
shouldn't cause reboot. Why does it?
Le 1 nov. 2015 3:53 PM, "Andrei Borzenkov" a écrit :
> I was debugging problem reported by user on Dell Dimension 8300 - it
> rebooted when doing "ls -l". It turned out, the problem was t
