Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Marco Gerards
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> >> Well, I see the problem but I do not agree with the solution. >> >> >> >> The problem

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Bean
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > >> Well, I see the problem but I do not agree with the solution. > >> > >> The problem for GRUB 2 is that initrd is very linux s

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Marco Gerards
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Well, I see the problem but I do not agree with the solution. >> >> The problem for GRUB 2 is that initrd is very linux specific. It's >> part of a loader. Perhaps we either have to extend loopb

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Bean
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > Well, I see the problem but I do not agree with the solution. > > The problem for GRUB 2 is that initrd is very linux specific. It's > part of a loader. Perhaps we either have to extend loopback to load a > file into memory on befo

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Marco Gerards
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:42:24AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> [...] >> >> >> That sounds much cleaner IMHO. But IIRC (md) is already in use by the >> >> RAID/LVM stuff ? >> >> >> > >> > Maybe (mem) ? >> >> When woul

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Bean
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:42:24AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > >> That sounds much cleaner IMHO. But IIRC (md) is already in use by the > >> RAID/LVM stuff ? > >> > > > > Maybe (mem) ? > > When would this be useful? You can use it to dump physi

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-14 Thread Marco Gerards
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> That sounds much cleaner IMHO. But IIRC (md) is already in use by the >> RAID/LVM stuff ? >> > > Maybe (mem) ? When would this be useful? > Also, I don't know if GRUB2 kernel support initrd. You can start grub4dos > like this: > > kernel /grub.exe > i

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-13 Thread Bean
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:08:09AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:46:49AM +0800, Bean wrote: > > These ideas are mostly from grub4dos, I think they can be useful in GRUB2. > > > > 1. cat > > > > In addition to the current function, cat can also generate hexadecimal > >

Re: Command extension suggestions

2007-06-13 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:46:49AM +0800, Bean wrote: > These ideas are mostly from grub4dos, I think they can be useful in GRUB2. > > 1. cat > > In addition to the current function, cat can also generate hexadecimal dump, > and it can optionally choose the range of bytes to display. For example